Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/35256

Cost-effectiveness of different strategies for screening and treatment of Strongyloides stercoralis in migrants from endemic countries to the European Union


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 Cost-effectiveness of different strategies.pdf

1,73 MB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:
Título :
Cost-effectiveness of different strategies for screening and treatment of Strongyloides stercoralis in migrants from endemic countries to the European Union
Autor :
Wikman-Jorgensen, Philip Erick  
Llenas-García, Jara  
shedrawy, jad  
Gascon, Joaquim
Muñoz, José
Bisoffi, Zeno
Requena-Mendez, Ana
Editor :
Board
Departamento:
Departamentos de la UMH::Medicina Clínica
Fecha de publicación:
2020-04-08
URI :
https://hdl.handle.net/11000/35256
Resumen :
Background: The best strategy for controlling morbidity due to imported strongyloidiasis in migrants is unclear. We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of six possible interventions.Methods: We developed a stochastic Markov chain model. The target population was adult migrants from endemic countries to the European Union; the time horizon, a lifetime and the perspective, that of the health system. Average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ACER and ICER) were calculated as 2016 EUR/life-year gained (LYG). Health interventions compared were: base case (no programme), primary care-based presumptive treatment (PCPresTr), primary care-based serological screening and treatment (PCSerTr), hospital-based presumptive treatment (HospPresTr), hospital-based serological screening and treatment (HospSerTr), hospital-based presumptive treatment of immunosuppressed (HospPresTrim) and hospital-based serological screening and treatment of the immunosuppressed (HospSerTrim). The willingness to pay threshold (WTP) was €32 126.95/LYG.Results: The base case model yielded a loss of 2 486 708.24 life-years and cost EUR 3 238 393. Other interventions showed the following: PCPresTr: 2 488 095.47 life-years (Δ1 387.23LYG), cost: EUR 8 194 563; ACER: EUR 3573/LYG; PCSerTr: 2 488 085.8 life-years (Δ1377.57LYG), cost: EUR 207 679 077, ACER: EUR 148 407/LYG; HospPresTr: 2 488 046.17 life-years (Δ1337.92LYG), cost: EUR 14 559 575; ACER: EUR 8462/LYG; HospSerTr: 2 488 024.33 life-years (Δ1316.08LYG); cost: EUR 207 734 073; ACER: EUR 155 382/LYG; HospPresTrim: 2 488 093.93 life-years, cost: EUR 1 105 483; ACER: EUR -1539/LYG (cost savings); HospSerTrim: 2 488 073.8 life-years (Δ1365.55LYG), cost: EUR 4 274 239; ACER: EUR 759/LYG. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken; HospPresTrim remained below WTP for all parameters' ranges and iterations.Conclusion: Presumptively treating all immunosuppressed migrants from areas with endemic Strongyloides would generate cost savings to the health system.
Palabras clave/Materias:
strongyloides stercoralis infection
health economics
infections
diseases, disorders
injuries
public health
screening
Tipo de documento :
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos de acceso:
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
DOI :
10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002321
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Medicina Clínica



Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.