Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://hdl.handle.net/11000/35256
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wikman-Jorgensen, Philip Erick | - |
dc.contributor.author | Llenas-García, Jara | - |
dc.contributor.author | shedrawy, jad | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gascon, Joaquim | - |
dc.contributor.author | Muñoz, José | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bisoffi, Zeno | - |
dc.contributor.author | Requena-Mendez, Ana | - |
dc.contributor.other | Departamentos de la UMH::Medicina Clínica | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T13:18:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-24T13:18:07Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-04-08 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | BMJ Glob Health . 2020 May;5(5):e002321. | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 2059-7908 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11000/35256 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The best strategy for controlling morbidity due to imported strongyloidiasis in migrants is unclear. We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of six possible interventions.Methods: We developed a stochastic Markov chain model. The target population was adult migrants from endemic countries to the European Union; the time horizon, a lifetime and the perspective, that of the health system. Average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ACER and ICER) were calculated as 2016 EUR/life-year gained (LYG). Health interventions compared were: base case (no programme), primary care-based presumptive treatment (PCPresTr), primary care-based serological screening and treatment (PCSerTr), hospital-based presumptive treatment (HospPresTr), hospital-based serological screening and treatment (HospSerTr), hospital-based presumptive treatment of immunosuppressed (HospPresTrim) and hospital-based serological screening and treatment of the immunosuppressed (HospSerTrim). The willingness to pay threshold (WTP) was €32 126.95/LYG.Results: The base case model yielded a loss of 2 486 708.24 life-years and cost EUR 3 238 393. Other interventions showed the following: PCPresTr: 2 488 095.47 life-years (Δ1 387.23LYG), cost: EUR 8 194 563; ACER: EUR 3573/LYG; PCSerTr: 2 488 085.8 life-years (Δ1377.57LYG), cost: EUR 207 679 077, ACER: EUR 148 407/LYG; HospPresTr: 2 488 046.17 life-years (Δ1337.92LYG), cost: EUR 14 559 575; ACER: EUR 8462/LYG; HospSerTr: 2 488 024.33 life-years (Δ1316.08LYG); cost: EUR 207 734 073; ACER: EUR 155 382/LYG; HospPresTrim: 2 488 093.93 life-years, cost: EUR 1 105 483; ACER: EUR -1539/LYG (cost savings); HospSerTrim: 2 488 073.8 life-years (Δ1365.55LYG), cost: EUR 4 274 239; ACER: EUR 759/LYG. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken; HospPresTrim remained below WTP for all parameters' ranges and iterations.Conclusion: Presumptively treating all immunosuppressed migrants from areas with endemic Strongyloides would generate cost savings to the health system. | es_ES |
dc.format | application/pdf | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 10 | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Board | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | strongyloides stercoralis infection | es_ES |
dc.subject | health economics | es_ES |
dc.subject | infections | es_ES |
dc.subject | diseases, disorders | es_ES |
dc.subject | injuries | es_ES |
dc.subject | public health | es_ES |
dc.subject | screening | es_ES |
dc.title | Cost-effectiveness of different strategies for screening and treatment of Strongyloides stercoralis in migrants from endemic countries to the European Union | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002321 | es_ES |
Ver/Abrir:
Cost-effectiveness of different strategies.pdf
1,73 MB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:
La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.