Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/40359

Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Active Myofascial Trigger Points Among Office Workers Using to Visual Display Terminals: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Title:
Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Active Myofascial Trigger Points Among Office Workers Using to Visual Display Terminals: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Authors:
POVEDA-PAGÁN, EMILIO J.  
Lozano-Quijada, Carlos  
Hernández-Sánchez, Sergio
Toledo-Marhuenda, José Vicente  
López Pintado, Eduardo
Segura-Heras, José Vicente  
Gascón Jaén, Jaime  
Editor:
Elsevier
Department:
Departamentos de la UMH::Patología y Cirugía
Issue Date:
2026
URI:
https://hdl.handle.net/11000/40359
Abstract:
Objective: To determine the prevalence of active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in office workers who sit for extended periods and use visual display terminals for ≥4 hours a day. Identify predictive factors associated with MTrP activation. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Administration and services departments in municipal settings (January-August 2025). Participants: A total of 305 municipal volunteer employees (N=305; 133 men: 36.30±8.80y; 172 women: 37.59±9.44y) aged 18-65 years who worked at a video display terminal for ≥4 hours daily were included. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Participants completed the Neck Disability Index and Oswestry Disability Index. A physiotherapist specialized in myofascial pain assessed bilateral MTrPs in cervical and lumbogluteal muscles using standardized palpation and algometry. Logistic regression models were developed to identify predictive factors, and model performance was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: Active MTrPs were found in 40% of participants in the right trapezius (25% men; 54% women), 35% in the left trapezius (18% men; 48% women), and 20% in the right sternocleidomastoid (9% men; 28% women), with consistently higher prevalence in women. Neck Disability Index and Oswestry Disability Index scores were identified as significant predictor factors (odds ratio>1), whereas higher pressure pain thresholds were protective (odds ratio<1). The models demonstrated good discriminative ability (area under the curve, 0.74-0.88) and high sensitivity (∼90%). Conclusions: Active MTrPs show high prevalence among office workers, particularly in women and the cervical region. Disability scores were associated with increased MTrP activation, whereas higher pressure pain thresholds were linked to lower activation. These findings suggest that incorporating algometry into musculoskeletal assessments and strengthening programs for cervical, scapular, and lumbar muscles may help prevent myofascial pain and disability in sedentary workers.
Keywords/Subjects:
Lowbackpain
Neckpain
Prevalence
Rehabilitation
Triggerpoints
Knowledge area:
CDU: Ciencias aplicadas: Medicina
Type of document:
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Access rights:
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
DOI:
10.1016/j.arrct.2026.100606
Published in:
Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation. 2026 Feb 26;8(2):100606
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Patología y Cirugía



Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???