Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/40323
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGil-Hernández, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorFalaschi, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorCarrillo, Irene-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Viviana-
dc.contributor.authorPeralta Roca, María Belén-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Elorrio, Ezequiel-
dc.contributor.authorMira, José Joaquín-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Psicología de la Saludes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-31T07:48:56Z-
dc.date.available2026-08-31T07:48:56Z-
dc.date.created2023-08-16-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research (2023) 23:869es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/40323-
dc.description.abstractBackground The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic required an immediate response to the healthcare challenges it posed. This study was conducted to identify actions that helped healthcare professionals to overcome the initial impact in Mendoza (Argentina). Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in a non-random sample of managers and staff of the public health system of Mendoza (Argentina) (n = 134). An ad-hoc and voluntary survey was carried out with 5 multi-response questions that combined questions referring to the management of the pandemic at the organizational level with others referring to coping at the individual level. The survey questions were formulated based on the results of six focus groups that were conducted previously. Descriptive frequency analysis was performed. Results 60 people agreed to participate and 45 answered the full questionnaire. At both the organizational and individual level, there was consensus with at least 50% of votes. The most outstanding at the organizational level was “Prioritize the need according to risk” and at the individual level it was “Support from family or friends”, being also the most voted option in the whole questionnaire. Conclusions The responses that emerged for coping with COVID-19 must be seen as an opportunity to identify strategies that could be effective in addressing future crisis situations that jeopardize the system’s response capacity. Moreover, it is essential to retain both changes at the organizational level (e.g., new protocols, multidisciplinary work, estructuring, etc.) and coping strategies at the individual level (e.g., social support, leisure activities, etc.) that shift r have proven positive outcomes.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent7es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCOVID-19es_ES
dc.subjectpandemices_ES
dc.subjecthealthcare workerses_ES
dc.subjectadaptationes_ES
dc.subjectleadershipes_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::1 - Filosofía y psicología::159.9 - Psicologíaes_ES
dc.titleClinical leadership and coping strategies in times of COVID-19: observational study with health managers in Mendozaes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09792-yes_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos- Psicología de la Salud


thumbnail_pdf
View/Open:
 5. Gil-Hernández et al. - 2023 - Clinical leadership and coping.pdf

696,37 kB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???