Resumen :
Given the rise in cyberbullying among secondary education students and the importance
of certain psychological adjustment variables for the comprehension of this
type of violent behavior, both in bullies and in victims, the purpose of the present
study was to analyse the emotional adjustment of those involved in cyber- and traditional
bullying. The adjustment variables studied were self-concept, perceived stress,
loneliness, depressive symptomatology, social anxiety, life satisfaction, and emotional
intelligence. Using a sample of 1318 adolescents (47% boys), aged between
11 and 17 years, four groups were established to compare victims and cybervictims
(uninvolved students, traditional victims, cybervictims, and traditional–cybervictims).
The analysis of variance showed that students who performed the same
role (bully or victim) in both contexts (at school and online). In particular, those
who suffered traditional or cyberbullying or both conjointly presented lower scores
in physical and social self-concept, life satisfaction, emotional clarity, and emotion
regulation, as well as higher scores in perceived stress, loneliness, depression, and
social anxiety. In bullies—traditional, cyberbullying or both simultaneously—higher
scores were observed in perceived stress, loneliness, depressive symptomatology,
fear of negative assessment, avoidance, and general social anxiety, and lower scores
in the dimensions of academic and family self-concept, life satisfaction, emotional
clarity, and emotion regulation. In general, the findings indicate that students who
were involved in bullying situations, both victims and bullies, presented more damaged
emotional profiles than those who are uninvolved, especially students who performed
the same role (bully or victim) in both contexts (at school and online).
|