Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/35844
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorHURTADO-POMARES, MIRIAM-
dc.contributor.authorTerol Cantero, M Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Perez, Alicia-
dc.contributor.authorPeral-Gómez, Paula-
dc.contributor.authorValera-Gran, Desirée-
dc.contributor.authorNavarrete-Muñoz, Eva María-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Patología y Cirugíaes_ES
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Salud Pública, Historia de la Ciencia y Ginecologíaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T09:01:47Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-07T09:01:47Z-
dc.date.created2017-05-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 33(2), 237-251 - June 2017es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1099-1166-
dc.identifier.issn0885-6230-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/35844-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The frontal assessment battery (FAB) is a brief tool designed to evaluate executive function. Some studies have particularly focused on assessing its applicability addressing two issues: first, on detecting the brain regions responsible for the FAB performance, and second, on determining its capability for differential diagnosis. Our aim was to summarize and analyze critically the studies that assessed the neuroanatomical correspondence and the differential diagnostic value of the FAB in several study populations suffering from different pathologies. Methods: We completed a literature search in MEDLINE (via PubMed) database by using the term “frontal assessment battery” and the combination of this term with “applicability” or “use” or “usefulness”. The search was limited to articles in English or Spanish languages, published between 1 September 2000 and 30 September 2016, human studies, and journal articles. Results: A total of 32 studies met inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies were aimed at identifying the brain regions or the neural substrates involved in executive functions measured by the FAB and 15 studies at verifying that the FAB was an appropriate tool for the differential diagnosis in neurological diseases. Conclusion: Our study showed that the FAB may be an adequate assessment tool for executive function and may provide useful information for differential diagnosis in several diseases. Given that the FAB takes short time and is easy to administer, its usage may be of great interest as part of a full neuropsychological assessment in clinical settings. Copyright # 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent15es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectfrontal assessment batteryes_ES
dc.subjectexecutive function assessmentes_ES
dc.subjectfrontal lobees_ES
dc.subjectclinical usefulnesses_ES
dc.subjectneuropsychological testses_ES
dc.titleThe frontal assessment battery in clinical practice: a systematic reviewes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4751es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Patología y Cirugía


no-thumbnailVer/Abrir:

 The FAB in clinical practice. A systematic review.pdf



493,45 kB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.