Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34889
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCarretero, G.-
dc.contributor.authorFerrandiz, C.-
dc.contributor.authorDauden, E.-
dc.contributor.authorVanaclocha Sebastián, F.-
dc.contributor.authorGómez-García, F. J.-
dc.contributor.authorHerrera Ceballos, E.-
dc.contributor.authorDe la Cueva-Dobao, P.-
dc.contributor.authorBelinchón, Isabel-
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Carazo, J. L.-
dc.contributor.authorAlsina-Gibert, M.-
dc.contributor.authorLópez Estebaranz, José Luis-
dc.contributor.authorFerrán, M.-
dc.contributor.authorTorrado, R.-
dc.contributor.authorCarrascosa, J. M.-
dc.contributor.authorCarazo, C.-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Medicina Clínicaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-18T08:58:42Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-18T08:58:42Z-
dc.date.created2015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2015 Jan;29(1):156-63es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1468-3083-
dc.identifier.issn0926-9959-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/34889-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Biobadaderm is the Spanish registry of psoriasis patients receiving systemic treatment in clinical practice. Objective: To compare the safety of biologics and classic systemic treatment. Methods: Prospective cohort of patients receiving biologics and classic systemic therapies between 2008 and 2013 in 12 hospitals are included. We registered demographic data, diagnoses, comorbidities, treatments and adverse events (AE). We obtained raw relative risks (RR) for specific AE. Multivariate analysis consisted of Cox models adjusting for age, gender, chronic hepatic disease and previous cancer. Results: A total of 1030 patients received biologics (2061 AE in 3681 person-years), 926 patients classic systemic drugs (1015 AE in 1517 person-years). Ninety-three per cent of AE in both groups were non-serious, 6% serious and 0.003% fatal. The age- and gender-adjusted hazard ratio of AE was lower in the biologics group [hazard ratio 0.6 (95% CI: 0.5-0.7)].We found no differences in rates of serious and mortal AE. Some system organ class AE rates differed between both groups. As limitations: Prescription bias might affect the incidence of AE in both groups. Association of drug and AE was based on timing: associations might not be causal. Conclusion: Patients receiving biologics had lower risk of AE. We did not find differences in the risk of serious or fatal AE.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent8es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleRisk of adverse events in psoriasis patients receiving classic systemic drugs and biologics in a 5-year observational study of clinical practice: 2008-2013 results of the Biobadaderm registryes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion10.1111/jdv.12492es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Medicina Clínica


no-thumbnailVer/Abrir:

 Risk of adverse events in psoriasis patients receiving classic systemic drugs and biologics in a 5‐year observational study of clinical practice 2008–2013 results of the B.pdf



87,54 kB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.