Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34186
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Varela Rodríguez, Sergio | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sánchez González, Juan Luis | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sanchez-Sanchez, José Luis | - |
dc.contributor.author | Delicado Miralles, Miguel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fernández-de-las-Peñas, César | - |
dc.contributor.author | Calderón Díez, Laura | - |
dc.contributor.other | Departamentos de la UMH::Patología y Cirugía | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-23T12:57:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-12-23T12:57:04Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-17 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Brain Sciences. 2021 Jun 17;11(6):801 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 2076-3425 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34186 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Percutaneous electrolysis consists of the application of a galvanic electrical current throughout an acupuncture needle. It has been previously hypothesized that needling procedures’ neurophysiological effects may be related to endogenous pain modulation (EPM). This protocol study describes the design of a double-blind (participant, assessor) randomized controlled trial with the aim to investigate whether percutaneous electrolysis is able to enhance EPM and whether the effect is different between two applications depending on the dosage of the galvanic electrical current. Seventy-two asymptomatic subjects not reporting the presence of pain symptoms the previous 6 months before the study, aged 18–40 years, are randomized into one of four groups: a control group who does not receive any intervention, a needling group who receives a needling intervention without electrical current, a low-intensity percutaneous electrolysis group (0.3 mA 90 s), and a high-intensity percutaneous electrolysis group (three bouts of 3 mA 3 s). Needling intervention consists of ultrasound-guided insertion of the needle on the common extensor tendon of the lateral epicondyle. The primary outcome is conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and secondary outcomes include widespread pressure pain sensitivity (pressure pain thresholds (PPT) over the lateral epicondyle, the cervical spine, and the tibialis anterior muscle) and temporal summation (TS). We expected that percutaneous electrolysis would have a greater influence on CPM than an isolated needling procedure and no intervention. In addition, we also postulated that there might be differences in outcome measures depending on the intensity of the electrical current during the percutaneous electrolysis application. This study makes a new contribution to the field of neurophysiological effects of percutaneous electrolysis and needling interventions. | es_ES |
dc.format | application/pdf | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 9 | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | MDPI | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Percutaneous electrolysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | Electrical stimulation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Ultrasonography | es_ES |
dc.subject | Conditioned pain modulation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Pain pressure threshold | es_ES |
dc.subject | Protocol | es_ES |
dc.title | Effects of Percutaneous Electrolysis on Endogenous Pain Modulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.contributor.institute | Institutos de la UMH::Instituto de Neurociencias | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci 11060801 | es_ES |
View/Open:
Effects of Percutaneous Electrolysis on Endogenous Pain Modulation A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol.pdf
398,45 kB
Adobe PDF
Share: