Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34186
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVarela Rodríguez, Sergio-
dc.contributor.authorSánchez González, Juan Luis-
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Sanchez, José Luis-
dc.contributor.authorDelicado Miralles, Miguel-
dc.contributor.authorFernández-de-las-Peñas, César-
dc.contributor.authorCalderón Díez, Laura-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Patología y Cirugíaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-23T12:57:04Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-23T12:57:04Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-17-
dc.identifier.citationBrain Sciences. 2021 Jun 17;11(6):801es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2076-3425-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/34186-
dc.description.abstractPercutaneous electrolysis consists of the application of a galvanic electrical current throughout an acupuncture needle. It has been previously hypothesized that needling procedures’ neurophysiological effects may be related to endogenous pain modulation (EPM). This protocol study describes the design of a double-blind (participant, assessor) randomized controlled trial with the aim to investigate whether percutaneous electrolysis is able to enhance EPM and whether the effect is different between two applications depending on the dosage of the galvanic electrical current. Seventy-two asymptomatic subjects not reporting the presence of pain symptoms the previous 6 months before the study, aged 18–40 years, are randomized into one of four groups: a control group who does not receive any intervention, a needling group who receives a needling intervention without electrical current, a low-intensity percutaneous electrolysis group (0.3 mA 90 s), and a high-intensity percutaneous electrolysis group (three bouts of 3 mA 3 s). Needling intervention consists of ultrasound-guided insertion of the needle on the common extensor tendon of the lateral epicondyle. The primary outcome is conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and secondary outcomes include widespread pressure pain sensitivity (pressure pain thresholds (PPT) over the lateral epicondyle, the cervical spine, and the tibialis anterior muscle) and temporal summation (TS). We expected that percutaneous electrolysis would have a greater influence on CPM than an isolated needling procedure and no intervention. In addition, we also postulated that there might be differences in outcome measures depending on the intensity of the electrical current during the percutaneous electrolysis application. This study makes a new contribution to the field of neurophysiological effects of percutaneous electrolysis and needling interventions.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent9es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectPercutaneous electrolysises_ES
dc.subjectElectrical stimulationes_ES
dc.subjectUltrasonographyes_ES
dc.subjectConditioned pain modulationes_ES
dc.subjectPain pressure thresholdes_ES
dc.subjectProtocoles_ES
dc.titleEffects of Percutaneous Electrolysis on Endogenous Pain Modulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocoles_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.contributor.instituteInstitutos de la UMH::Instituto de Neurocienciases_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci 11060801es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Patología y Cirugía


Thumbnail

View/Open:
 Effects of Percutaneous Electrolysis on Endogenous Pain Modulation A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol.pdf

398,45 kB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???