Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34186
Effects of Percutaneous Electrolysis on Endogenous Pain Modulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol
Título : Effects of Percutaneous Electrolysis on Endogenous Pain Modulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol |
Autor : Varela Rodríguez, Sergio Sánchez González, Juan Luis Sanchez-Sanchez, José Luis Delicado Miralles, Miguel Fernández-de-las-Peñas, César Calderón Díez, Laura |
Editor : MDPI |
Departamento: Departamentos de la UMH::Patología y Cirugía |
Fecha de publicación: 2021-06-17 |
URI : https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34186 |
Resumen :
Percutaneous electrolysis consists of the application of a galvanic electrical current throughout an acupuncture needle. It has been previously hypothesized that needling procedures’ neurophysiological effects may be related to endogenous pain modulation (EPM). This protocol study describes the design of a double-blind (participant, assessor) randomized controlled trial with the aim to investigate whether percutaneous electrolysis is able to enhance EPM and whether the effect is different between two applications depending on the dosage of the galvanic electrical current. Seventy-two asymptomatic subjects not reporting the presence of pain symptoms the previous 6 months before the study, aged 18–40 years, are randomized into one of four groups: a control group who does not receive any intervention, a needling group who receives a needling intervention without electrical current, a low-intensity percutaneous electrolysis group (0.3 mA 90 s), and a high-intensity percutaneous electrolysis group (three bouts of 3 mA 3 s). Needling intervention consists of ultrasound-guided insertion of the needle on the common extensor tendon of the lateral epicondyle. The primary outcome is conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and secondary outcomes include widespread pressure pain sensitivity (pressure pain thresholds (PPT) over the lateral epicondyle, the cervical spine, and the tibialis anterior muscle) and temporal summation (TS). We expected that percutaneous electrolysis would have a greater influence on CPM than an isolated needling procedure and no intervention. In addition, we also postulated that there might be differences in outcome measures depending on the intensity of the electrical current during the percutaneous electrolysis application. This study makes a new contribution to the field of neurophysiological effects of percutaneous electrolysis and needling interventions.
|
Palabras clave/Materias: Percutaneous electrolysis Electrical stimulation Ultrasonography Conditioned pain modulation Pain pressure threshold Protocol |
Tipo de documento : info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Derechos de acceso: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional |
DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci 11060801 |
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos Patología y Cirugía
|
La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.