Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34180
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDelicado Miralles, Miguel-
dc.contributor.authorFlix Díez, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorGurdiel-Álvarez, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorVelasco, Enrique-
dc.contributor.authorGalán-Calle, María-
dc.contributor.authorLerma Lara, Sergio-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Patología y Cirugíaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-23T12:54:02Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-23T12:54:02Z-
dc.date.created2024-04-30-
dc.identifier.citationBrain Sciences. 2024, 14, 457es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2076-3425-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/34180-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe intervention, only producing mild and transient adverse effects (AEs). However, there is no detailed analysis of the pattern of adverse effects in an application transferable to the clinic. Therefore, our objective is to describe the AEs produced by tDCS and its temporal evolution. (2) Methods: A total of 33 young volunteers were randomized into a tDCS or sham group. Participants performed a hand dexterity task while receiving the tDCS or sham intervention (20 min and 1 mA), for five consecutive days. AEs were assessed daily after each intervention and classified as somatosensory, pain, or other effects. (3) Results: The number of AEs was generally increased by tDCS intervention. Specifically, tDCS led to more frequent somatosensory discomfort, characterized by sensations like itching and tingling, alongside painful sensations such as burning, compared to the sham intervention. Additionally, certain adverse events, including neck and arm pain, as well as dizziness and blurry vision, were exclusive to the tDCS group. Interestingly, tDCS produced similar AEs across the days; meanwhile, the somatosensory AEs in the sham group showed a trend to decrease. (4) Conclusions: tDCS produces mild and temporary somatosensory and pain AEs during and across sessions. The different evolution of the AEs between the tDCS and sham protocol could unmask the blinding protocol most used in tDCS studies. Potential solutions for improving blinding protocols for future studies are discussed.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent14es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectbilateral transcranial direct current stimulation (bi-tDCS)es_ES
dc.subjectadverse effectses_ES
dc.subjecttranscranial stimulationes_ES
dc.subjectpatient safetyes_ES
dc.subjectadverse effects’ temporal evolutiones_ES
dc.subjectblinding protocoles_ES
dc.titleTemporal Dynamics of Adverse Effects across Five Sessions of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulationes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Patología y Cirugía


Thumbnail

View/Open:
 Temporal Dynamics of Adverse Effects across Five Sessions of Transcranial Direct Current Stim.pdf

1,67 MB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???