Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34179
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorVarela Rodríguez, Sergio-
dc.contributor.authorSánchez García, José Luis-
dc.contributor.authorVelasco Diaz, Jorge Enrique-
dc.contributor.authorDelicado Miralles, Miguel-
dc.contributor.authorSánchez González, Juan Luis-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Patología y Cirugíaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-23T12:53:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-23T12:53:35Z-
dc.date.created2022-05-20-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Medicine. 2022, 11, 2889es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/34179-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this double-blinded randomized controlled trial was to investigate whether percutaneous electrolysis (PE) is able to activate endogenous pain modulation and whether its effects are dependent on the dosage of the galvanic current. A total of 54 asymptomatic subjects aged 18–40 years were randomized into three groups, receiving a single ultrasound-guided PE intervention that consisted of a needle insertion on the lateral epicondyle tendon: sham (without electrical current), low-intensity (0.3 mA, 90 s), and high-intensity (three pulses of 3 mA, 3 s). Widespread pressure pain thresholds (PPT), conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and temporal summation (TS) were assessed in the elbow, shoulder, and leg before and immediately after the intervention. Both high and low intensity PE protocols produced an increase in PPT in the shoulder compared to sham (p = 0.031 and p = 0.027). The sham group presented a significant decrease in the CPM (p = 0.006), and this finding was prevented in PE groups (p = 0.043 and p = 0.025). In addition, high-intensity PE decreased TS respect to sham in the elbow (p = 0.047) and both PE groups reduced TS in the leg (p = 0.036 and p = 0.020) without significant differences compared to sham (p = 0.512). Consequently, a single PE intervention modulated pain processing in local and widespread areas, implying an endogenous pain modulation. The pain processing effect was independent of the dosage administrated.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent14es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectpercutaneous electrolysises_ES
dc.subjectelectrical stimulationes_ES
dc.subjectpain managementes_ES
dc.subjectpain thresholdes_ES
dc.subjectpostsynaptic potential summationes_ES
dc.subjectrandomized controlled triales_ES
dc.titleEndogenous Pain Modulation in Response to a Single Session of Percutaneous Electrolysis in Healthy Population: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Triales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.contributor.instituteInstitutos de la UMH::Instituto de Neurocienciases_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102889es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Patología y Cirugía


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 Endogenous Pain Modulation in Response to a Single Session..pdf

1,95 MB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.