Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/31057

Usually hated, sometimes loved: A review of wild ungulates' contributions to people


no-thumbnailVer/Abrir:

 Science of the Total Environment - 2021- Pascual-Rico - Ussually hated, sometimes loved.pdf



1,4 MB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:

Este recurso está restringido

Título :
Usually hated, sometimes loved: A review of wild ungulates' contributions to people
Autor :
Pascual-Rico, Roberto  
Morales-Reyes, Zebensui  
Aguilera-Alcalá, Natividad  
Olszańska, Agnieszka  
Sebastián-González, Esther  
Naidoo, Robin  
Moleón, Marcos  
Lozano, Jorge
Botella Robles, Francisco  
von Wehrden, Henrik  
Martín, Berta  
Sánchez Zapata, José Luis  
Editor :
Elsevier
Departamento:
Departamentos de la UMH::Biología Aplicada
Fecha de publicación:
2021-08
URI :
https://hdl.handle.net/11000/31057
Resumen :
Nature's contributions to people (NCP) may be both beneficial and detrimental to humans' quality of life. Since our origins, humans have been closely related to wild ungulates, which have traditionally played an outstanding role as a source of food or raw materials. Currently, wild ungulates are declining in some regions, but recovering in others throughout passive rewilding processes. This is reshaping human-ungulate interactions. Thus, adequately understanding the benefits and detriments associated with wild ungulate populations is necessary to promote human-ungulate co-existence. Here, we reviewed 575 articles (2000-2019) on human-wild ungulate interactions to identify key knowledge gaps on NCP associated with wild ungulates. Wild ungulate research was mainly distributed into seven research clusters focussing on: (1) silvicultural damage in Eurasia; (2) herbivory and natural vegetation; (3) conflicts in urban areas of North America; (4) agricultural damage in Mediterranean agro-ecosystems; (5) social research in Africa and Asia; (6) agricultural damage in North America; (7) research in natural American Northwest areas. Research mostly focused on detrimental NCP. However, the number of publications mentioning beneficial contributions increased after the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services conceptual framework was implemented. Human-ungulate interactions' research was biased towards the Global North and Cervidae, Suidae and Bovidae families. Regarding detrimental NCP, most publications referred to production damage (e.g. crops), followed by biodiversity damage, and material damage (e.g. traffic collisions). Regarding beneficial NCP, publications mainly highlighted non-material contributions (e.g. recreational hunting), followed by material NCP and regulating contributions (e.g. habitat creation). The main actions taken to manage wild ungulate populations were lethal control and using deterrents and barriers (e.g. fencing), which effectiveness was rarely assessed. Increasing research and awareness about beneficial NCP and effective management tools may help to improve the conservation of wild ungulates and the ecosystems they inhabit to facilitate people-ungulate co-existence in the Anthropocene
Palabras clave/Materias:
Artiodactyla
Ecological functions
herbivores
Human-wildlife relations
Mammal management
Perissodactyla
Área de conocimiento :
CDU: Ciencias puras y naturales: Biología: Biología general y teórica
Tipo de documento :
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos de acceso:
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149652
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Biología Aplicada



Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.