Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/36520
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorClemente Villalba, Jesús-
dc.contributor.authorCano-Lamadrid, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorIssa-Issa, Hanan-
dc.contributor.authorHurtado, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorHernández García, Francisca-
dc.contributor.authorCarbonell-Barrachina, Ángel A.-
dc.contributor.authorLópez Lluch, David-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Economía Agroambiental,Ing. Cartográfica y Expresión Gráfica en la Ingenieríaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-16T08:30:45Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-16T08:30:45Z-
dc.date.created2020-11-
dc.identifier.citationLWT - Food Science and Technology 140 (2021) 110606es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1096-1127-
dc.identifier.issn0023-6438-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/36520-
dc.description.abstractCyperus esculentus tubers are the raw material to prepare tigernut milk (horchata), which can be marketed under Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) “C hufa de Valencia”. The aim of this study was to characterize commercial tigernut milks and compare PDO and non-PDO products. The following aspects were studied: (i) volatile profile, (ii) descriptive sensory profile, (iii) consumer satisfaction degree. The key volatile compounds were limonene, benzaldehyde, linalool and m-methoxyanisole. Principal component analysis indicated a mix of PDO and non- PDO samples in the groups formed. The highest consumer satisfactions were observed for 2 PDO samples. Penalty analysis showed that 80% of non-PDO samples needed improvements, while this percentage drastically decreased to 40% for PDO samples. The online study proved that a lot of people drink horchata, less people know the PDO Chufa de Valencia and even less people consume the protected product consciously. In conclusion, there was not a clear difference among protected and non-protected tigernut milks respect to volatile compounds but there were differences in the degree of consumer preference. So, it is clear that a lack of knowledge regarding the product and its PDO exists and needs attention.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent9es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectChufa de valenciaes_ES
dc.subjectHorchataes_ES
dc.subjectM-methoxyanisolees_ES
dc.subjectPenalty analysises_ES
dc.subjectPrincipal component analysises_ES
dc.titleComparison on sensory profile, volatile composition and consumer’s acceptance for PDO or non-PDO tigernut (Cyperus esculentus L.) milkes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110606es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Economía Agroalimentaria


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 chufa LWT.pdf

2,19 MB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.