Title: Effect of exercise modality and intensity on endothelial function in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
Authors: Fuertes-Kenneally, Laura Baladzhaeva, Sabina Manresa-Rocamora, Agustín Sempere-Ruiz, Noemí Sanz-Rocher, Ana Blasco-Peris, Carles Sarabia, José Manuel |
Editor: European Association of Preventive Cardiology |
Department: Departamentos de la UMH::Ciencias del Deporte |
Issue Date: 2026-02-19 |
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/40754 |
Abstract:
Aims: Endothelial dysfunction is a hallmark of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Exercise effectively improves endothelial function, yet the impact of different modalities and intensities remains unclear. This study evaluated the effect of aerobic (AE), resistance (RE), and combined exercise (CE) on endothelial function measured by flow-mediated dilation (FMD).
Methods and results:
A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials in adults
with coronary artery disease or chronic heart failure was conducted. Electronic databases were searched up to
April 2025. Interventions were classified as usual care (UC), moderate-intensity AE (MAE), high-intensity interval
AE (HIIE), moderate-intensity RE (MRE), high-intensity RE (HRE), moderate-intensity CE (MCE), and high-intensity
CE (HCE). Mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as effect size index, and
interventions were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Thirty-seven studies (80
groups; n = 6818) were included. Compared with UC, MAE (2.04%; 95% CI: 1.01–3.07), HIIE (3.47%; 95% CI:
2.02–4.92), MCE (2.71%; 95% CI: 0.05–5.36), and HCE (8.25%; 95% CI: 3.18–13.32) significantly improved brachial
FMD, whereas MRE did not. HIIE outperformed MAE (1.43%; 95% CI: 0.09–2.78). Although HCE showed
the highest surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA: 98.2%), this relied on a single group. Crucially,
sensitivity analyses confirmed HIIE as the most robust high-performing intervention (84.0%) compared with
MRE (61.6%) and MCE (61.3%).
Conclusion: Exercise significantly enhances endothelial function in patients with CVD. HIIE emerged as the most robust and evidence-based modality, demonstrating superior efficacy over moderate continuous exercise. While high-intensity combined protocols (HCE) show significant theoretical potential, randomized trials are urgently needed to confirm their efficacy. Current evidence supports HIIE as a primary strategy for vascular adaptation in cardiac rehabilitation. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lay summary This network meta-analysis confirms that structured exercise training effectively improves endothelial function
in patients with cardiovascular disease.
• High-intensity interval training offers the most robust benefits across different ages and conditions, proving
superior to moderate-intensity continuous exercise.
• A progressive training strategy is recommended to maximize long-term results, starting with moderate exercise
for conditioning and advancing to high-intensity or resistance exercise.
|
Keywords/Subjects: endothelial-dependent dilation exercise modality high-intensity interval exercise cardiac rehabilitation cardiovascular disease FMD |
Knowledge area: CDU: Bellas artes: Diversiones. Espectáculos. Cine. Teatro. Danza. Juegos.Deportes |
Type of document: info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Access rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwag118 |
Published in: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology - Vol. 33, Issue 8 (2026), pp. 1363-1375 |
Appears in Collections: Artículos Ciencias del Deporte
|