Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/40469
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMartín Rivera, Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigo Mallorca, Darío-
dc.contributor.authorVidal Vidal, José Vicente Cayetano-
dc.contributor.authorFranco Grau, Luis María-
dc.contributor.authorSáez Berlanga, Ángel-
dc.contributor.authorChulvi Medrano, Iván-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ciencias del Deportees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-07T13:36:49Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-07T13:36:49Z-
dc.date.created2026-
dc.identifier.citationSensors, 2026, vol.25, nº6es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/40469-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Accurate monitoring of eccentric phase velocity is needed to support velocity-based training (VBT), yet field-valid tools for multi-joint exercises are scarce. This study evaluated the concurrent validity and reliability of an optoelectronic device to quantify eccentric phase velocity during the Smith machine back squat. Methods: A total of 20 resistance-trained men completed two sessions and performed three repetitions at three submaximal loads (20, 50, and 70 kg). Eccentric mean velocity and peak velocity (Vmax) were recorded simultaneously using PowerTrackTM and a criterion system (MuscleLabTM). Validity was assessed using ordinary least products regression, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Bland–Altam analysis. Reliability was examined via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), coefficient of variation, and minimum detectable change. Results: Agreement between devices was very high for Vmax (slope ≈ 1.00; CCC = 0.95), with a small constant bias. Eccentric mean velocity showed proportional bias under higher velocity conditions, whereas overall concordance remained high (CCC = 0.95). Inter-session reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.87–0.96), with low SEM values for eccentric velocity metrics. Conclusions: PowerTrackTM can be a valid and reliable tool for monitoring eccentric phase velocity during the Smith machine back squat, with Vmax representing the most robust metric for applied eccentric VBT.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent14es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjecteccentric phase monitoringes_ES
dc.subjectvelocity-based traininges_ES
dc.subjectlinear position transduceres_ES
dc.subjectback squates_ES
dc.subjectmeasurement validityes_ES
dc.subjectreliabilityes_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::7 - Bellas artes::79 - Diversiones. Espectáculos. Cine. Teatro. Danza. Juegos.Deporteses_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::62 - Ingeniería. Tecnología::621 - Ingeniería mecánica en general. Tecnología nuclear. Electrotecnia. Maquinaria::621.3 - Ingeniería eléctrica. Electrotecnia. Telecomunicacioneses_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::61 - Medicina::612 - Fisiologíaes_ES
dc.titleFrom Physiology to Practice: Validation of Eccentric Velocity Monitoring Using an Optoelectronic Systemes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/s26061797es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Ciencias del Deporte


thumbnail_pdf
Ver/Abrir:
 From_Physiology_to_Practice_Validation_of_Eccentri.pdf

2,62 MB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.