Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/35439
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTorrús, Diego-
dc.contributor.authorPérez Molina, José A.-
dc.contributor.authorLópez Polín, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorTreviño Maruri, Begoña-
dc.contributor.authorMolina, Israel-
dc.contributor.authorGoikoetxea, Josune-
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Menéndez, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorCalabuig, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorBenito, Agustín-
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Vélez, Rogelio-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Agroquímica y Medio Ambientees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-29T07:53:18Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-29T07:53:18Z-
dc.date.created2017-04-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Travel Medicine, Volume 24, Issue 5, September-October 2017es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1708-8305-
dc.identifier.issn1195-1982-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/35439-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Understanding and detecting imported diseases is a priority in the prevention and management of prevalent and emergent infectious diseases acquired abroad. TheþRedivi network measures the burden of imported infections in Spain and is essential for closing the gap in travel medicine. Methods: Demographic characteristics, travel information, syndromes and confirmed travel-related diagnoses were registered in a standardised online database. Results: A total of 10 767 cases of imported infectious diseases were registered between October 2009 and December 2015. Of these, 60.8% of cases were immigrants seen for the first time after arrival, 20.6% were travellers, and 18.4% were individuals visiting friends and relatives (VFR [immigrants and travellers]). The median time between arrival and medical consultation was 5.5 years for immigrants, 2.0 weeks for travellers, 3.1 weeks for VFRtravellers and 11.4 for VFR-immigrants. The most prevalent diagnoses were Chagas disease in immigrants and nonspecific acute diarrhoea in travellers. Malaria by P. falciparum was one of the most prevalent diagnoses among VFR. More than half the travellers saw a physician before travelling, although one-third of those for whom antimalarial medication was indicated did not take their medication correctly. As for VFR, only 10.4% of VFR-immigrants and 32.5% of VFR-travellers sought pre-travel advice. Only 23 and 21%, respectively, of those for whom antimalarial prophylaxis was indicated took the medication properly. Conclusions:þRedivi provides a clear picture of the prevalence of imported infectious diseases among travellers and immigrants in Spain. The data collected could be used to improve everyday health care provided to travellers and immigrants after travel, to guide pre-travel consultations and to monitor the potential occurrence of tropical or exotic infectious diseases.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent7es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford University Presses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectTravelleres_ES
dc.subjectmigrantses_ES
dc.subject+Redivies_ES
dc.subjecttraveles_ES
dc.subjectnetworkes_ES
dc.title6-year review of 1Redivi: a prospective registry of imported infectious diseases in Spaines_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/tax035es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Agroquímica y Medio Ambiente


no-thumbnailView/Open:

 tax035.pdf



240,28 kB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???