Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34798
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorORTIZ, LIDIA-
dc.contributor.authorMontserrat, Dolors-
dc.contributor.authorSuarez, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorMira, José Joaquín-
dc.contributor.authorGaitán Duarte, Hernando-
dc.contributor.authorReveiz, Ludovic-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Estadística, Matemáticas e Informáticaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-17T09:12:25Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-17T09:12:25Z-
dc.date.created2015-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal for Quality in Health Carees_ES
dc.identifier.issn1464-3677-
dc.identifier.issn1353-4505-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/34798-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Determine the frequency and preventability of adverse events (AEs) from available information sources in selected ambulatory care (AC) sites in Latin America (LA). Design: Multinational observational cohort was conducted to determine the period prevalence (retrospective focus) and the cumulative incidence (prospective focus) of AEs. Setting: Outpatient clinics in Mexico, Peru, Brazil and Colombia. Participants: A random selection of 2080 patients. Interventions: The existence of AEwas decided based on trigger information provided by the patient and crossing the data with each patient’s medical history. Main Outcome Measures: AE occurrences 6 months prior (prevalence) and 42 days after (incidence) the patient receiving AC were identified. AE type and preventability were also described. Results: Two thousand eighty patients participated in the study. AEs prevalencewas 5.2% (108/2080) [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2–6.1%], and cumulative incidence was 2.4% (42/1757) (95% CI 1.7–3.1%). AEs considered preventable were 44% (55/108) of prevalence period, and 52.4% (22/42) of incidence period. Preventability was associated with patient socioeconomic status (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.4–8.8), medication error (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.0–0.4), diagnostic error (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.0–0.8) and a minor impact on the patient (OR 0.2 95% CI 0.1–0.9). Conclusion: The frequency of AE in ambulatory settings in LA is in the high-frequency range of research focused on the prevalence of AEs. Fifty percent was preventable. This study provides an approach for assessing the frequency and preventability of AE in order to enhance patient safety in LA.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent8es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford University Presses_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries27es_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries1es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectpatient safetyes_ES
dc.subjectadverse eventses_ES
dc.subjectprimary carees_ES
dc.subjectambulatory carees_ES
dc.subjectLatin Americaes_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturales::51 - Matemáticases_ES
dc.titleFrequency of ambulatory care adverse events in Latin American countries: the AMBEAS/PAHO cohort studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzu100es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Estadística, Matemáticas e Informática


no-thumbnailVer/Abrir:

 2015 Frequency of ambulatory care adverse events in Latin American.pdf



215,38 kB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.