Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34320
Laboratory diagnosis of endophthalmitis: Comparison of microbiology and molecular methods in the European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons multicenter study and susceptibility testing
Ver/Abrir: 2008 Laboratory diagnosis of endophthalmitis Comparision of microbiology and molecular methods in the ESCRS.pdf
230,22 kB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:
Este recurso está restringido
Título : Laboratory diagnosis of endophthalmitis: Comparison of microbiology and molecular methods in the European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons multicenter study and susceptibility testing |
Autor : Ferrer, Consuelo Seal, David Behr, Anke Alió, Jorge L. Koerner, Roland J. Barry, Peter |
Editor : Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins |
Departamento: Departamentos de la UMH::Producción Vegetal y Microbiología |
Fecha de publicación: 2008-09 |
URI : https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34320 |
Resumen :
PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the use of molecular biology with the use of traditional Gram
stain and organism culture for the laboratory diagnosis of postoperative endophthalmitis.
SETTING: Twenty-four ophthalmology units together with 9 microbiology laboratories and 2 European reference molecular biology laboratories.
METHODS: A prospective randomized partially masked multicenter cataract surgery study recruited
16 603 patients. This resulted in 29 cases of presumed postoperative endophthalmitis. Gram stain
and culture were performed in the local laboratory according to agreed protocols. Samples of aqueous and/or vitreous were transported to the first referenced molecular biology laboratory (Regensburg, Germany) for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, and an extracted aliquot of DNA was
then referred to the second laboratory (Alicante, Spain) for PCR.
RESULTS: Of the 29 who presented with presumed postoperative endophthalmitis, 20 were classified as proven infective endophthalmitis with positive Gram stain, culture, or PCR. Fourteen patients
were culture-positive; all but 1 of these was also positive by PCR. Six patients were positive by PCR
but negative by Gram stain or culture. Nine patients were negative by both microbiology and PCR
testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of molecular biology technique increased the laboratory rate of identifying
the pathogen by 20%, confirming the technique is very useful for the endophthalmitis specimen.
Samples of both aqueous and vitreous should be collected and stored at 20C for PCR at the
time of the diagnostic taps
|
Tipo de documento : info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Derechos de acceso: info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional |
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.043 |
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos Producción vegetal y microbiología
|
La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.