Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34319
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFerrer, Consuelo-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Alejandra-
dc.contributor.authorAbad, José-Luis-
dc.contributor.authorAlió, Jorge L.-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Producción Vegetal y Microbiologíaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-11T14:04:34Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-11T14:04:34Z-
dc.date.created2015-01-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Ophthalmology 2008; 92 585-585es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1468-2079-
dc.identifier.issn0007-1161-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/34319-
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal 1.5% levofloxacin versus combined treatment with vancomycin and ceftazidime in an experimental model of bacterial endophthalmitis. Methods: The right eye of 75 New Zealand White rabbits was inoculated in the vitreous cavity with strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The study evaluated treatment with 1.5% levofloxacin compared with 1% vancomycin plus 2.2% ceftazidime, and a control group. At 24 h after treatment, 100 μl vitreous and aqueous humor were harvested, and the number of colony-forming units (CFU) per ml was determined. The microbiological status of the vitreous and aqueous humor samples was tested at day 2, 3, 5 and 8. The Peyman classification was used to assess the severity of endophthalmitis. Results: For the S epidermidis endophthalmitis model, levofloxacin treatment produced an approximately 3 log decrease in CFU/ml of vitreous relative to that in untreated eyes (p = 0.023), whereas vancomycin plus ceftazidime produced a 5 log reduction in CFU/ml (p = 0.023). However, in the S aureus model, levofloxacin treatment produced an approximately 4 log reduction in CFU/ml, whereas vancomycin plus ceftazidime produced an approximately 2 log reduction in CFU/ml relative to that of the control (p = 0.018 and p = 0.019, respectively). Treatment of P aeruginosa-infected rabbit eyes with levofloxacin produced a 5 log reduction in CFU/ml of vitreous, whereas vancomycin plus ceftazidime produced an approximately 3–4 log reduction in CFU/ml relative to that of the control (p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between levofloxacin and vancomycin plus ceftazidime on comparing the reduction of CFU/ml of vitreous for any of the bacterial strains studied. Conclusions: Levofloxacin appears to be effective in treating experimental endophthalmitis in the rabbit model. Further studies, especially on the toxicity of intravitreal levofloxacin, are required before a clinical role for the drug in postoperative therapy can be determined.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent6es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleBactericidal effect of intravitreal levofloxacin in an experimental model of endophthalmitises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.124768es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Producción vegetal y microbiología


no-thumbnail
View/Open:

 2008 Bactericidal effect of intravitreal levofloxacin in an experimental model of endophthalmitis.pdf



310,65 kB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???