Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/32368
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHernández, Francisca-
dc.contributor.authorNúñez-Gómez, Dámaris-
dc.contributor.authorMelgarejo Moreno, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Nicolás, Juan José-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Font, Rafael-
dc.contributor.authorLidón Noguera, Vicente -
dc.contributor.authorLegua, Pilar-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Producción Vegetal y Microbiologíaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-28T10:50:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-28T10:50:03Z-
dc.date.created2023-08-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Microbiome volume 18, Article number: 69 (2023)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/32368-
dc.description.abstractBackground The soil microbiota has a direct impact on plant development and other metabolic systems, such as the degradation of organic matter and the availability of microelements and metabolites. In the context of agricultural soils, microbial activity is crucial for maintaining soil health and productivity. Thus, the present study aimed to identify, characterize, and quantify the microbial communities of four types of substrates with varying proportions of marine port sediment used for cultivating lemons. By investigating microbial diversity and relative abundance, the work aimed to highlight the importance of soil microbial communities in agriculture when alternative culture media was used. Results The composition and structure of the sampled microbial communities were assessed through the amplification and sequencing of the V3-V4 variable regions of the 16 S rRNA gene The results revealed a diverse microbial community composition in all substrate samples, with a total of 41 phyla, 113 classes, 266 orders, 405 families, 715 genera, and 1513 species identified. Among these, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, Planctomycetota, Patescibacteria, Chloroflexi, Actinobacteriota, Acidobacteriota, Verrucomicrobiota, and Gemmatimonadota accounted for over 90% of the bacterial reads, indicating their dominance in the substrates. Conclusions The impact of the substrate origin on the diversity and relative abundace of the microbiota was confirmed. The higher content of beneficial bacterial communities for plant development identified in peat could explain why is considered an ideal agricultural substrate. Development of “beneficial for plants” bacterial communities in alternative agricultural substrates, regardless of the edaphic characteristics, opens the possibility of studying the forced and specific inoculation of these culture media aiming to be agriculturally ideals.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent14es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBMCes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectMicrobiomees_ES
dc.subject16S rRNAes_ES
dc.subjectMarine sedimentes_ES
dc.subjectAgricultural substratees_ES
dc.subjectWaste reusees_ES
dc.subjectFunctional inferenceses_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::63 - Agricultura. Silvicultura. Zootecnia. Caza. Pescaes_ES
dc.titleEffects of marine sediment as agricultural substrate on soil microbial diversity: an amplicon sequencing studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-023-00519-4es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Producción vegetal y microbiología


Thumbnail

View/Open:
 s40793-023-00519-4.pdf

2,56 MB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???