Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11000/32259
Performance Overview of the Latest Video Coding Proposals: HEVC, JEM and VVC
Title: Performance Overview of the Latest Video Coding Proposals: HEVC, JEM and VVC |
Authors: Martínez-Rach, Miguel Onofre Migallon, Hector López Granado, Otoniel Mario Galiano, Vicente Malumbres, Manuel P. |
Editor: MDPI |
Department: Departamentos de la UMH::Ingeniería de Computadores |
Issue Date: 2021-02-22 |
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/32259 |
Abstract:
The audiovisual entertainment industry has entered a race to find the video encoder
offering the best Rate/Distortion (R/D) performance for high-quality high-definition video content.
The challenge consists in providing a moderate to low computational/hardware complexity encoder
able to run Ultra High-Definition (UHD) video formats of different flavours (360◦
, AR/VR, etc.) with
state-of-the-art R/D performance results. It is necessary to evaluate not only R/D performance, a
highly important feature, but also the complexity of future video encoders. New coding tools offering
a small increase in R/D performance at the cost of greater complexity are being advanced with
caution. We performed a detailed analysis of two evolutions of High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)
video standards, Joint Exploration Model (JEM) and Versatile Video Coding (VVC), in terms of both
R/D performance and complexity. The results show how VVC, which represents the new direction of
future standards, has, for the time being, sacrificed R/D performance in order to significantly reduce
overall coding/decoding complexity.
|
Keywords/Subjects: HEVC JEM VVC video coding standards performance |
Knowledge area: CDU: Ciencias aplicadas: Ingeniería. Tecnología |
Type of document: application/pdf |
Access rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7020039 |
Appears in Collections: Artículos Ingeniería de computadores
|
???jsp.display-item.text9???