Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/31854
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCámara-Zapata, José-María-
dc.contributor.authorBrotons, Jose M-
dc.contributor.authorSimón Grao, Silvia-
dc.contributor.authorMartinez Nicolas, Juan Jose-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Sánchez, Francisco-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Estudios Económicos y Financieroses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-27T10:41:45Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-27T10:41:45Z-
dc.date.created2019-06-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculturees_ES
dc.identifier.issn1097-0010-
dc.identifier.issn0022-5142-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/31854-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The current need to produce food for a growing population, from diminishing natural resources, such as water and energy, and with minimum environmental degradation, demands the optimization of production. We compare the economic feasibility of tomato production in an open system with a perlite substrate, a closed system with the nutrient film technique (NFT), and a hydroponic crop (deep flowtechnique,DFT) using three levels of salinity that are found within the normal range for irrigation water quality in southeastern Spain. RESULTS: Production with DFT resulted in an increase in the cost of phytosanitary treatments and the cost of maintenance. Production with perlite resulted in an increase in the cost of irrigation water and fertilization, and the use of NFT resulted in an increase in energy costs. The point of price equilibrium was exceeded in the three soilless systems when using low salinity water, and in perlite, with intermediate salinity water. CONCLUSION: Profitability was reduced in the following order: perlite > NFT>DFT. There were positive results when using irrigation water with low salinity, and in the case of perlite, with intermediate salinity. In every case, salinity reduced the profitability of the operation, and this was greater when NFT was employed. The analysis of these soilless systems should be continued to determine the possibility of reducing cultivation costs.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent10es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectcostses_ES
dc.subjectproductiones_ES
dc.subjectincomees_ES
dc.subjectbenefitses_ES
dc.subjectbreak-even pointes_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturales::50 - Generalidades sobre las ciencias purases_ES
dc.titleCost–benefit analysis of tomato in soilless culture systems with saline water under greenhouse conditionses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9857es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Estudios Económicos y Financieros


Thumbnail

View/Open:
 04 2019 Cost benefit analysis of tamato.pdf

4,35 MB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???