Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/31849
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Marín, J.-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, M.-
dc.contributor.authordel Amor, F.M.-
dc.contributor.authorGálvez, A.-
dc.contributor.authorBrotons, Jose M-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Estudios Económicos y Financieroses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-27T07:57:22Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-27T07:57:22Z-
dc.date.created2019-03-07-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Agricultural Science and Technology (2019) Vol. 21(2): 235-248es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2345-3737-
dc.identifier.issn1680-7073-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/31849-
dc.description.abstractThe tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most popular and widely consumed vegetables in the world, being also the most common vegetable within the Mediterranean diet. The last few years have seen the appearance on the market of several types of agricultural plastic developed to alter the spectrum of radiation that enters the greenhouse, sometimes filtering it and, in other cases, intensifying certain wavelength bands. The objective of this study was to evaluate the production of tomato cultivated under different covers and to analyze the profitability of the yield, under each of them. A study was carried out in six tunnel greenhouses, with an area of 100 m2 each, to evaluate the effect of different types of plastic roof, with different radiation properties. The yield of tomatoes was recorded and valued economically as a function of the mean prices of the Consejería de Agricultura de la Región de Murcia (CARM) (Department of Agriculture of the Region of Murcia) of the last years and one survey of the wholesale markets network (Mercas) and farmers, in order to know the weekly prices according to the caliber. The production costs of each of the alternatives were determined and the net present value of the yield and the annualized value were obtained. The highest annualized value was obtained with the UVA100%e cover (€24,856.04 per year), followed by UV90%e and PeTc (€18,931.49 and €16,205.53 per year, respectively). The LDe and Anti NIR covers provided the poorest results (€3,954.93 and €10,480.40 per year, respectively).es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent14es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherTarbiat Modares University Presses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectGreenhouse tomatoes_ES
dc.subjectPhotoselective filmses_ES
dc.subjectRoofing materialses_ES
dc.subjectUVA100%e coveres_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::3 - Ciencias sociales::33 - Economíaes_ES
dc.titleCost-Benefit Analysis of Tomato Crops under Different Greenhouse Coverses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Estudios Económicos y Financieros


no-thumbnailVer/Abrir:

 13 2019 Cost benefit Tomato J. Agr Sci Tech. article-23-16418-en.pdf



635,2 kB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.