Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/31016
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorValverde Orozco, Víctor Hugo-
dc.contributor.authorGavilanes Terán, Irene-
dc.contributor.authorIdrovo Novillo, Julio César-
dc.contributor.authorCarrera Beltrán, Lourdes Cumandá-
dc.contributor.authorBasantes-Cascante, Cristian-
dc.contributor.authorBustamante, Maria Angeles-
dc.contributor.authorParedes, Concepcion-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Agroquímica y Medio Ambientees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T08:41:57Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T08:41:57Z-
dc.date.created2023-03-21-
dc.identifier.citationAgronomy 2023, 13(3), 929es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2073-4395-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/31016-
dc.description.abstractOn-farm composting of agro-livestock wastes can be considered the most appropriate method for their recycling. Pile turning (PW) is one of the most widely used aeration systems for composting. However, this system has long composting periods and is inefficient at supplying oxygen and controlling the temperature. To minimize these drawbacks, the combination of turnings with forced aeration (PR) is an option; in this work, this combination was compared to PW as an aeration system for the co-composting of vegetable waste with different manures. In this comparative study, the evolution of the process, the compost quality and the economic and environmental impacts of the process were evaluated. The PR system was more appropriate for obtaining sanitized composts (the temperature was ≥55 °C for at least three consecutive days) with an adequate degree of maturity. Furthermore, this system reduced the organic matter and nutrient losses, yielding composts with higher agronomic value and a higher total combined value of the nutrients than those obtained using the PW system. However, the energy consumption and associated CO2 emissions were lower for the PW system, since this aeration system was based only on turnings without the use of forced aeration, as in the case of the PR system. Agricultural valorization of composts will offset this energy consumption and its impact, since it will contribute to reducing the use of synthetic fertilizers. However, more studies are required on the PR composting system and other agro-livestock wastes for the creation of centralized on-farm composting sites, where all steps of the composting chain are optimizedes_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent16es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMPDIes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAgro-livestock wasteses_ES
dc.subjectCompostes_ES
dc.subjectForced aerationes_ES
dc.subjectPile turninges_ES
dc.subjectCombined aeration systemes_ES
dc.titleAgronomic, Economic and Environmental Comparative of Different Aeration Systems for On-Farm Compostinges_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030929es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Agroquímica y Medio Ambiente


Thumbnail

View/Open:
 Agronomic, Economic and Environmental Comparative of Different.pdf

876,96 kB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???