Title: Identification of vaginal microbiome associated with IVF pregnancy |
Authors: Lledo, B. Fuentes, A. Lozano, F. M. Cascales, A. Morales, R. Hortal, M. Sellers, F. Palacios‑Marques, A. Bermejo, R. Quereda, Francisco Martinez Escoriza, Juan Carlos Bernabeu, R. Bernabeu, A. |
Editor: Nature Research |
Department: Departamentos de la UMH::Salud Pública, Historia de la Ciencia y Ginecología |
Issue Date: 2022-04-26 |
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/30943 |
Abstract:
The factors that cause a preterm birth (PTB) are not completely understood up to date. Moreover,
PTB is more common in pregnancies achieved by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) than in spontaneous
pregnancies. Our aim was to compare the composition of vaginal microbiome at 12 weeks of gestation
between women who conceived naturally or through IVF in order to study whether IVF PTB-risk could
be related to vaginal microbiome composition. We performed an observational, prospective and
multicentre study among two public hospitals and a fertility private clinic in Spain. Vaginal swabs from
64 pregnant women at 12 weeks of gestation were collected to analyse the microbiome composition
by sequencing the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA. Our results showed that the vaginal microbiome
signature at 12 weeks of pregnancy was different from women who conceived naturally or through
IVF. The beta diversity and the genus composition were different between both cohorts. Gardnerella,
Neisseria, Prevotella, and Staphylococcus genus were enriched genus in the vaginal microbiome from
the IVF group, allowing us to create a balance model to predict both cohorts. Moreover, at species
level the L. iners abundance was higher and L. gasseri was lower in the IVF group. As a conclusion, our
findings were consistent with a proposed framework in which IVF pregnancy are related to risk for
preterm birth (PTB) suggesting vaginal microbiome could be the reason to the relation between IVF
pregnancy and risk for PTB.
|
Type of document: application/pdf |
Access rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10933-2 |
Appears in Collections: Artículos Salud Pública, Historia de la Ciencia y Ginecología
|