Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/28979
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGehrke, Sergio-
dc.contributor.authorAramburú Junior, Jaime-
dc.contributor.authorEirlesTreichel, Tiago Luis-
dc.contributor.authorDias do Prado, Tales-
dc.contributor.authorAnina Dedavid, Berenice-
dc.contributor.authorDe Aza, Piedad-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ciencia de Materiales, Óptica y Tecnología Electrónicaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-17T08:55:07Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-17T08:55:07Z-
dc.date.created2022-01-
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports, 12 (2022)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/28979-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present in vivo study was to analyze and compare the effects on the crestal bone healing of two different implant macrogeometries installed in fresh socket areas and in normal bone areas with different insertion torque values. Two implant macrogeometries were used in the present study, DuoCone implant (DC) and Maestro implant (MAE), forming four groups: group DCws, in which the implants were installed in healing bone (without a socket); group DCfs, in which the implants were installed in post-extraction areas (fresh sockets); group MAEws, in which the implants were installed in healing bone (without a socket); group MAEfs, in which the implants were installed in post-extraction areas (fresh sockets). After 30 and 90 days of implantations in the bilateral mandibles of 10 sheep, eighty implants were evaluated through digital X-ray images and histologic slices. The crestal bone position in relation to the implant platform shoulder was measured and compared. The measured insertion torque was 47.2 ± 4.69 Ncm for the DCws group, 43.4 ± 4.87 Ncm for the DCfs group, 29.3 ± 3.16 Ncm for the MAEws group, and 27.7 ± 4.41 Ncm for the MAEfs group. The radiographic mesio-distal and histological bucco-lingual analyses showed significantly greater vertical bone loss in the implants installed with high torque (DC groups) in comparison to the implants installed with a low torque (MAE groups) (p < 0.05), at both evaluation times. In general, low insertion torque values (Maestro implants) showed better results of MBL when compared to implants installed with higher torque values (Duo Cone implants). Moreover, our results showed that the implants installed in the sites without sockets showed a less MBL in comparison with the implants installed in sites of fresh sockets.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipPart of this work was supported by Ministry of Science and Innovation—Grant PID2020-116693RB-C21 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033-
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent13es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherUniversidad Miguel Hernández de Elchees_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherCDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::62 - Ingeniería. Tecnología::620 - Ensayo de materiales. Materiales comerciales. Economía de la energíaes_ES
dc.titleEffects of insertion torque values on the marginal bone loss of dental implants installed in sheep mandibleses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos CIENCIA DE LOS MATERIALES ÓPTICA Y TECNOLOGÍA ELECTRÓNICA


Thumbnail

View/Open:
 Scientific Repors Sergio.pdf

3,25 MB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???