Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/40181
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMigallón-Gomis, Héctor-
dc.contributor.authorJimeno-Morenilla, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorDuta-Costache, Eduard-
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Romero, José Luis-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ingeniería de Computadoreses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-13T17:18:36Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-13T17:18:36Z-
dc.date.created2026-
dc.identifier.citationArray - Vol. 29 (2026)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2590-0056-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/40181-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an efficient approach to toolpath generation tailored to the needs of Industry 5.0, with a focus on turning lathe machining. The study addresses the challenge of rapidly and accurately generating helical toolpaths in personalized manufacturing, where traditional sequential methods often become computational bottlenecks. To overcome this limitation, we propose efficient parallel implementations of the Virtual Digitizing (VD) algorithm, specifically designed to accelerate the computation of machining trajectories on both multicore and manycore architectures. The multicore implementation achieves notable speedups, especially when execution is properly tuned. The manycore strategy explores both asynchronous (coarsegrained) and synchronous (fine-grained) execution models. In the asynchronous method, independent trajectory computations are assigned to separate CUDA threads, whereas the synchronous method further parallelizes the internal processing of each trajectory point, providing finer computational granularity. Experimental evaluations conducted on authentic industrial shoe last models reveal notable gains in computational efficiency. The manycore implementation achieves up to 70𝑥 acceleration on low-end GPUs, over 80𝑥 on high-range devices and over 270𝑥 on state-of-the-art GPU devices when compared to their respective CPU-based computations. Although the synchronous method introduces additional complexity, it delivers the best performance on powerful GPU platforms, whereas the asynchronous method is better suited for resource-constrained systems. Therefore, the study concludes that the optimal parallelization strategy depends on the available hardware.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent17es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectindustry 5.0es_ES
dc.subjectcustomized manufacturinges_ES
dc.subjectreal time toolpath generationes_ES
dc.subjectparallel computinges_ES
dc.subjectmulticore processinges_ES
dc.subjectmanycore processinges_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::0 - Generalidades.::04 - Ciencia y tecnología de los ordenadores. Informática.es_ES
dc.titleEfficient tool path computing for Industry 5.0: Application to turning lathe machininges_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2026.100701es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Ingeniería de computadores


Thumbnail

View/Open:
 efficient toolpath.pdf

2,5 MB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???