Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/39404

Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for the detection of Mycobacterium leprae from Ziehl-Neelsen-stained microscopic slides


Thumbnail

View/Open:
 Comparison of four DNA extraction methods.pdf

422,47 kB
Adobe PDF
Share:
Title:
Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for the detection of Mycobacterium leprae from Ziehl-Neelsen-stained microscopic slides
Authors:
Ruiz-Fuentes, Jenny Laura
Díaz, Alexis
Entenza, Anayma Elena
Frión, Yahima
Suárez, Odelaisy
Torres, Pedro  
de Armas, Yaxsier
Acosta Soto, Lucrecia  
Editor:
Medknow Publications
Department:
Departamentos de la UMH::Agroquímica y Medio Ambiente
Issue Date:
2015
URI:
https://hdl.handle.net/11000/39404
Abstract:
Objective/background: The diagnosis of leprosy has been a challenge due to the low sensibility of the conventional methods and the impossibility of culturing the causative organism. In this study, four methods for Mycobacterium leprae nucleic-acid extraction from Ziehl-Neelsen-stained slides (ZNS slides) were compared: Phenol/chloroform, Chelex 100 resin, and two commercial kits (Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit and QIAamp DNA Mini Kit). Methods: DNA was extracted from four groups of slides: a high-codification-slide group (bacteriological index [BI]⩾4), a low-codification-slide group (BI=1), a negative-slide group (BI=0), and a negative-control-slide group (BI=0). Quality DNA was evidenced by the amplification of specific repetitive element present in M. leprae genomic DNA (RLEP) using a nested polymerase chain reaction. Results: This is the first report comparing four different extraction methods for obtaining M. leprae DNA from ZNS slides in Cuban patients, and applied in molecular diagnosis. Good-quality DNA and positive amplification were detected in the high-codification-slide group with the four methods, while from the low-codification-slide group only the QIAGEN and phenol-chloroform methods obtained amplification of M. leprae. In the negative-slide group, only the QIAGEN method was able to obtain DNA with sufficient quality for positive amplification of the RLEP region. No amplification was observed in the negative-control-slide group by any method. Patients with ZNS negative slides can still transmit the infection, and molecular methods can help identify and treat them, interrupting the chain of transmission and preventing the onset of disabilities. Conclusion: The ZNS slides can be sent easily to reference laboratories for later molecular analysis that can be useful not only to improve the diagnosis, but also for the application of other molecular techniques.
Keywords/Subjects:
DNA extraction methods
Leprosy
Molecular diagnosis
Mycobacterium leprae
Ziehl–Neelsen-stained microscopic slides
Type of document:
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Access rights:
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijmyco.2015.06.005
Published in:
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2015 Dec;4(4):284-9
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Agroquímica y Medio Ambiente



Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???