Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/36132
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFerrández-Mas, Jesús-
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Amador, Beatriz-
dc.contributor.authorMarzo, Juan C-
dc.contributor.authorFalcó, Raquel-
dc.contributor.authorMolina-Torres, Jonatan-
dc.contributor.authorCervin, Matti-
dc.contributor.authorPiqueras, Jose A-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Psicología de la Saludes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-26T09:17:06Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-26T09:17:06Z-
dc.date.created2023-04-29-
dc.identifier.citationChildren 2023, 10(5), 803es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2227-9067-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/36132-
dc.description.abstractCognitive emotion regulation refers to the management of one’s emotions through cognitive strategies. Studies have found that individuals with obsessive–compulsive symptoms utilize emotion regulation strategies differently compared to those without these symptoms. This study aims to investigate the relationship between cognitive strategies for emotion regulation and specific dimensions of obsessive–compulsive symptoms in adolescents. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with 307 adolescents between 12 and 18 years old. Associations between sociodemographic variables, obsessive–compulsive symptoms, and emotion regulation strategies were examined using regression and network analyses. Regression results indicated that emotion regulation strategies and gender accounted for 28.2% of the variation in overall obsessive–compulsive symptoms (p < 0.001) and that emotion regulation explained most variance in the symptom dimension of obsessing. Network analysis showed that self-blame and catastrophizing were uniquely linked to overall obsessive–compulsive symptoms, while several strategies were uniquely linked to specific symptom dimensions. The adaptive strategy that demonstrated the strongest association with obsessive–compulsive symptoms was refocus on planning, while maladaptive strategies included catastrophizing, self-blame, and rumination. In conclusion, the results support the relationship between cognitive strategies for emotion regulation and dimensions of obsessive–compulsive symptoms in adolescents, though these relations appear complex and require further investigation. Addressing emotion regulation in the prevention of obsessive–compulsive symptoms may be warranted, but prospective studies are needed.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent14es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectOCDes_ES
dc.subjectOCD symptomatology dimensionses_ES
dc.subjectemotion dysregulationes_ES
dc.subjectcognitive-emotion regulationes_ES
dc.subjectadolescentses_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::1 - Filosofía y psicología::159.9 - Psicologíaes_ES
dc.titleRelationship between Cognitive Strategies of Emotion Regulation and Dimensions of Obsessive–Compulsive Symptomatology in Adolescentses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/children10050803es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos- Psicología de la Salud


Thumbnail

View/Open:
 2023_children-10-00803.pdf

659,01 kB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???