Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34910
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMira, José Joaquín-
dc.contributor.authorCarrillo, Irene-
dc.contributor.authorGuilabert, Mercedes-
dc.contributor.authorMula Leal, Aurora -
dc.contributor.authorMartin Delgado, Jimmy-
dc.contributor.authorPérez Jover, Maria Virtudes-
dc.contributor.authorVicente, María Asunción-
dc.contributor.authorFernández, César-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Psicología de la Saludes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-18T09:53:30Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-18T09:53:30Z-
dc.date.created2020-10-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open 2020;10es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/34910-
dc.description.abstractObjectives To determine the volume of health professionals who suffered distress due to their care of patients with COVID-19 and to analyse the direction in which the response capacity of the professionals to face future waves of COVID-19 is evolving. Design A cross- sectional study. Setting Primary care and hospitals in Spain. Participants A non- randomised sample of 685 professionals (physicians, nurses and other health staff). Primary and secondary outcome measures Frequency and intensity of stress responses measured by the Acute Stress of Health Professionals Caring COVID-19 Scale (EASE). Variation of stress responses according to the number of deaths per day per territory and the evolutionary stage of the COVID-19 outbreak measured by the Kruskal- Wallis and the Mann- Whitney U tests. Results The average score on the EASE Scale was 11.1 (SD 6.7) out of 30. Among the participants, 44.2% presented a good emotional adjustment, 27.4% a tolerable level of distress, 23.9% medium–high emotional load and 4.5% extreme acute stress. The stress responses were more intense in the most affected territories (12.1 vs 9.3, p=0.003) and during the disillusionment phase (12.7 vs 8.5 impact, 10.2 heroic and 9.8 honeymoon, p=0.000). Conclusions The pandemic has affected the mental health of a significant proportion of health professionals which may reduce their resilience in the face of future waves of COVID-19. The institutional approaches to support the psychological needs of health professionals are essential to ensure optimal care considering these results.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent10es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectanxiety disorderses_ES
dc.subjectdepression & mood disorderses_ES
dc.subjecthealth policyes_ES
dc.subjectorganisation of health serviceses_ES
dc.subjectpublic healthes_ES
dc.subjectquality in health carees_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::1 - Filosofía y psicología::159.9 - Psicologíaes_ES
dc.titleAcute stress of the healthcare workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic evolution: a cross- sectional study in Spaines_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2020-042555es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos- Psicología de la Salud


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 2.e042555.full.pdf

576,65 kB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.