Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/33517
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorNardi-Rodríguez, Ainara-
dc.contributor.authorPastor-Mira, María Ángeles-
dc.contributor.authorLópez Roig, Sofía-
dc.contributor.authorPamies-Aubalat, Lidia-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Zaragoza, Fermín-
dc.contributor.authorFerrer-Perez, Victoria A.-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ciencias del Comportamiento y saludes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-16T08:59:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-16T08:59:05Z-
dc.date.created2022-01-27-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, 19(3), 1441es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827-
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/33517-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Partner violence prevention programmes do not produce the expected behavioural changes. Accordingly, experts suggest applying evidence-based behavioural models to identify the determinants of abusive behaviours. In this research, we applied the reasoned action approach (RAA) to predict the performance (boys) and acceptance (girls) of abusive behaviours in adolescents. (2) Method: We designed a questionnaire based on the RAA and performed a cross-sectional study. We analysed the predictive capacity of the RAA constructs on intentions with the sample of single adolescents (n = 1112). We replicated the analysis only with those who were in a relationship (n = 587) and in addition analysed the predictive capacity of intention on future behaviour (3 months later). (3) Results: The hierarchical regression analysis performed with the sample of single adolescents showed that the model explained 56% and 47% of the variance of boys’ intentions to perform the controlling and devaluing behaviours, respectively; and 62% and 33% of girls’ intention to accept them. With those in a relationship, the model explained 60% and 53% of the variance of boys’ intentions to perform the controlling and devaluating behaviour, respectively, and 70% and 38% of girls’ intention to accept them. Intention exerted direct effects on boys’ performance of controlling and devaluing behaviours (31% and 34% of explained variance, respectively) and on girls’ acceptance (30% and 7%, respectively). (4) Conclusions: The RAA seems useful to identify the motivational determinants of abusive behaviours, regardless of adolescents’ relationship status, and for their prediction. Perceived social norms emerge as a relevant predictor on which to intervene to produce behavioural changes with both sexes.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent16es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectabusive behaviourses_ES
dc.subjectadolescencees_ES
dc.subjectdating violencees_ES
dc.subjectpreventiones_ES
dc.subjectreasoned action approaches_ES
dc.subjectevidence-based modeles_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::1 - Filosofía y psicología::159.9 - Psicologíaes_ES
dc.titlePredicting Abusive Behaviours in Spanish Adolescents Relationships: Insights from the Reasoned Action Approaches_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031441es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Ciencias del Comportamiento y Salud


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 2022 Nardi et al Predicting abusive behaviors ijerph.pdf

1,21 MB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.