Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/30414

A classification system for teachers’ motivational behaviors recommended in self-determination theory interventions

Title:
A classification system for teachers’ motivational behaviors recommended in self-determination theory interventions
Authors:
Ahmadi, Asghar
Noetel, Michael
Parker, Philip  
Ryan, Richard M
Ntoumanis, Nikos
Reeve, Johnmarshall
Beauchamp, Mark  
Dicke, Theresa
Yeung, Alexander
Ahmadi, Malek  
Bartholomew, Kimberley
Thomas K.F. Chiu
Thomas Curran
Erturan, Gökçe
Flunger, Barbara  
Frederick, Christina
Froiland, John  
González-Cutre, David
Leen Haerens
Lucas Matias Jeno
Koka, Andre  
Krijgsman, Christa  
Langdon, Jody  
White, Rhiannon Lee
Litalien, David
Lubans, David
Mahoney, John
Nalipay, Ma. Jenina
Patall, Erika
Perlman, Dana  
Quested, Eleanor  
Schneider, Sascha  
Standage, Martyn
Stroet, Kim  
Tessier, Damien
Thogersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie
Tilga, Henri  
Vasconcellos, Diego
Lonsdale, Chris
Department:
Departamentos de la UMH::Ciencias del Deporte
Issue Date:
2023
URI:
https://hdl.handle.net/11000/30414
Abstract:
Teachers’ behaviour is a key factor that influences students’ motivation. Many theoretical models have tried to explain this influence, with one of the most thoroughly researched being self-determination theory (SDT). We used a Delphi method to create a classification of teacher behaviours consistent with SDT. This is useful because SDT-based interventions have been widely used to improve educational outcomes. However, these interventions contain many components. Reliably classifying and labelling those components is essential for implementation, reproducibility, and evidence synthesis. We used an international expert panel (N = 34) to develop this classification system. We started by identifying behaviours from existing literature, then refined labels, descriptions, and examples using the Delphi panel’s input. Next, the panel of experts iteratively rated the relevance of each behaviour to SDT, the psychological need that each behaviour influenced, and its likely effect on motivation. To create a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive list of behaviours, experts nominated overlapping behaviours that were redundant, and suggested new ones missing from the classification. After three rounds, the expert panel agreed upon 57 teacher motivational behaviours that were consistent with SDT. For most behaviours (77%), experts reached consensus on both the most relevant psychological need and influence on motivation. Our classification system provides a comprehensive list of teacher motivational behaviours and consistent terminology in how those behaviours are labelled. Researchers and practitioners designing interventions could use these behaviours to design interventions, to reproduce interventions, to assess whether these behaviours moderate intervention effects, and could focus new research on areas where experts disagreed.
Keywords/Subjects:
taxonomy
engagement
intervention design
behaviour change techniques
BCT
Knowledge area:
CDU: Filosofía y psicología: Psicología
Type of document:
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Access rights:
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000783
Published in:
Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(8), 1158–1176.
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Ciencias del Deporte



Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.