Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/5242
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorPasquariello, Federica-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ciencia Jurídicaes
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-18T07:37:11Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-18T07:37:11Z-
dc.date.created2019-01-
dc.date.issued2019-07-18-
dc.identifier.issn2445-0936-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11000/5242-
dc.description.abstractIn response to cross-border insolvencies, conflicts of law and jurisdiction may arise and they cannot be resolved in a strictly Territorial approach. In fact, in an era of globalized and interconnected economies, an insolvency proceeding on a narrow national basis, which coexists with at least one other local proceeding may lead to unexpected outcomes. Actually, under Territorialism, each Country seizes the debtor’s assets which are located within its borders and conducts a separate bankruptcy proceeding to divide those assets among local creditors according to local law, while no proceeding affects each other. This causes a sharp fragmentation of the active and passive masses, and produces disappointing effects both on the level of creditors’ recovery, and on the front of an increase of costs as well.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent6es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.subjectterritorialismoes
dc.subjectinsolvencias transfronterizases
dc.subject.otherCDU::3 - Ciencias sociales: 34 - Derechoes
dc.titleProtocols and other voluntary commitments within european transnational insolvency regulation, EIR 848/2015es
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
Aparece en las colecciones:
Núm. 11 Enero-Marzo 2019


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 1659-4850-2-PB.pdf
159,16 kB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución 4.0 Internacional.