Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/40697
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorSerna‑Serna, Paula-
dc.contributor.authorAlos‑Simó, Lirios-
dc.contributor.authorProkop, Viktor-
dc.contributor.authorErceg, Aleksandar-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Estudios Económicos y Financieroses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-17T11:29:59Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-17T11:29:59Z-
dc.date.created2026-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Sciences Europees_ES
dc.identifier.issn2190-4715-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/40697-
dc.description.abstractAlthough carbon neutrality has become a strategic imperative, it is often implemented from a technical perspective, without considering the organization’s strategic vision. This study therefore employs a management perspective to analyze Circular Economy (CE) practices—reduction, recycling, and redesign—as differential drivers of the adoption of corporate carbon neutrality (CCN) strategies. To offer comprehensive picture, we are also focusing on the moderating roles of different sectors of activities. Drawing on the (Natural) Resource-Based View and using binary logistic regression, we analyzed a sample of 6393 companies from 27 EU countries, extracted from Flash Eurobarometer 498. The results confirm the significance of redesigning and recycling in driving CCN adoption. By contrast, we show that reduction is only effective for companies in the service industry, where it exercises a pure moderating effect. Moreover, we show that service companies are more likely to adopt CCN than manufacturing ones. This study makes a threefold contribution. First, it transcends the technical approach to frame carbon neutrality as a strategic management challenge. Second, it disaggregates the CE construct, providing empirical evidence of the differential impact of CE practices. Third, it provides a decision-making framework for managers by demonstrating that the effectiveness of CE strategies for achieving carbon neutrality is not universal but depends fundamentally on sectoral context.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent18es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. 38. Número 124es_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseriespp 1-18es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectcorporate carbon neutralityes_ES
dc.subjectservice industryes_ES
dc.subjectcircular economyes_ES
dc.subjectreductiones_ES
dc.subjectrecyclinges_ES
dc.subjectredesignes_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::3 - Ciencias sociales::33 - Economíaes_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturales::50 - Generalidades sobre las ciencias purases_ES
dc.titleAre circular economy practices drivers of carbon neutrality? Cross‑industry insights from European firms’ perspectivees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-026-01403-xes_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos - Estudios Económicos y Financieros


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 3. serna_serna, alos_simo, prokop, erceg, 2026.pdf

1,15 MB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.