Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/39684
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorSabido-Solana, Rafael-
dc.contributor.authorAsencio, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Valverde, Adrián-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Aguilar, Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Lila, Rodrigo-
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Davó, José Luis-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ciencias del Deportees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-30T17:07:32Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-30T17:07:32Z-
dc.date.created2023-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Sports Medicine - Vol. 44, Issue 06 (2023) pp. 438-442es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1439-3964-
dc.identifier.issn0172-4622-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/39684-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to assess the influence of the load order used (i. e. incremental, decremental or random loads order) during the bench press throw load-velocity profile on peak velocity achieved against four different loads (20–40–60–80 % of one repetition maximum [1RM]). Both intraclass cor-relation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated to assess the reliability of the measures. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess differences between pro-tocols. A linear regression analysis was performed to assess the load-velocity relationships among the different protocols. Peak velocity showed good to high ICC values independently of the load used (ICC = 0.83–0.92). CV scores showed good reliability (ranging between 2.2 and 6.2 %). No significant differences in peak velocity attained at each load were found between the three testing protocols (p > 0.05). In addition, peak velocity at each load was very large to almost perfect, correlated between protocols (r = 0.790–0.920). The linear regression model showed a significant relationship between testing protocols (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.94). In conclusion, due to some ICC scores below 0.9 and R2 below 0.95, the indistinct use of different load-order protocols to assess load-velocity relationships in the bench press throw exercise is not recommended.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent6es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherThiemees_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectstrengthes_ES
dc.subjectresistancees_ES
dc.subjecttestinges_ES
dc.subjectprofilees_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::7 - Bellas artes::79 - Diversiones. Espectáculos. Cine. Teatro. Danza. Juegos.Deporteses_ES
dc.titleThe Use of Incremental, Decremental or a Random Order of Loads does not Affect Peak velocity Values during Bench Press Throw Load-Velocity Relationshipses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion10.1055/a-1982-3686es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Ciencias del Deporte


no-thumbnailVer/Abrir:

 The Use of Incremental, Decremental or a Random Order of Loads does not Affect Peak velocity Values during Bench Press Throw Load-velocity Relationships.pdf



865,83 kB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.