Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/39480
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorRamos Rincón, José Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorPinargote-Celorio, Héctor-
dc.contributor.authorBelinchón , Isabel -
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Alcaide, Gregorio-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Medicina Clínicaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-05T09:43:56Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-05T09:43:56Z-
dc.date.created2019-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 184 - September 2019es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1471-2288-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/39480-
dc.description.abstractBackground: This article describes a bibliometric review of the scientific production, geographical distribution, collaboration, impact, and subject area focus of pneumonia research indexed on the Web of Science over a 15-year period. Methods: We searched the Web of Science database using the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) of “Pneumonia” from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2015. The only document types we studied were original articles and reviews, analyzing descriptive indicators by five-year periods and the scientific production by country, adjusting for population, economic, and research-related parameters. Results: A total of 22,694 references were retrieved. The number of publications increased steadily over time, from 981 publications in 2001 to 1977 in 2015 (R2 = 0.956). The most productive country was the USA (38.49%), followed by the UK (7.18%) and Japan (5.46%). Research production from China increased by more than 1000%. By geographical area, North America (42.08%) and Europe (40.79%) were most dominant. Scientific production in low- and middle-income countries more than tripled, although their overall contribution to the field remained limited (< 15%). Overall, 18.8% of papers were the result of an international collaboration, although this proportion was much higher in sub-Saharan Africa (46.08%) and South Asia (23.43%). According to the specific MeSH terms used, articles focused mainly on “Pneumonia, Bacterial” (19.99%), followed by “Pneumonia, Pneumococcal” (7.02%) and “Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated” (6.79%). Conclusions: Pneumonia research increased steadily over the 15-year study period, with Europe and North America leading scientific production. About a fifth of all papers reflected international collaborations, and these were most evident in papers from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent17es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Centrales_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectpneumoniaes_ES
dc.subjectbibliometricses_ES
dc.subjectscientometricses_ES
dc.subjectscientific productiones_ES
dc.subjectmappinges_ES
dc.subjectpublicationses_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::61 - Medicinaes_ES
dc.titleA snapshot of pneumonia research activity and collaboration patterns (2001–2015): a global bibliometric analysis.es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0819-4es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Medicina Clínica


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 A snapshot of pneumonia research activity and collaboration patterns (2001–2015), a global bibliometric analysis.pdf

4,74 MB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.