Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/39471
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Núñez, Juan Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorde Miguel Balsa, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorSoriano, Vicente-
dc.contributor.authorLorenzo-Garrido, Edurado-
dc.contributor.authorGiménez-Richarte, Ángel-
dc.contributor.authorOtero-Rodríguez, Silvia-
dc.contributor.authorCelis Salinas, Juan Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorde Mendoza, Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorCasapia-Morales, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorRamos Rincón, José Manuel-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Medicina Clínicaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-05T09:20:40Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-05T09:20:40Z-
dc.date.created2024-06-
dc.identifier.citationInt J Infect Dis . 2024 Jun:143:107018es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1878-3511-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/39471-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Human T-lymphotropic viruses (HTLV)-1 infection is endemic in many countries of Central and South America and Caribbean (CSA&C). Neither screening nor surveillance programs exist for HTLV-1/2 infection among pregnant women in this region. Neither in Western nations with large migrant flows from HTLV-1/2 endemic regions. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of HTLV-1/2 infection among CSA&C pregnant women. We included studies searching EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to February 15, 2023. This systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. Results: We identified a total of 620 studies. Only 41 were finally included in the meta-analysis. Most studies (61.0%) were from Brazil and Peru (14.6%). The total number of participants was 343,707. The pooled prevalence of HTLV-1/2 infection among CSA&C pregnant women was 1.30% (95% CI: 0.96-1.69) using anti-HTLV-1/2 antibody screening tests. There was a high heterogeneity (I2 = 98.6%). Confirmatory tests gave an HTLV-1 infection rate of 1.02% (95% CI: 0.75-1.33). Conclusions: The prevalence of HTLV-1/2 infection among CSA&C pregnant women is 1.3%, most cases being HTLV-1. This rate is greater than for other microbial agents regularly checked as part of antenatal screening (such as HIV, hepatitis B, or syphilis). Thus, HTLV-1/2 antenatal testing should be mandatory among CSA&C pregnant women everywhere.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent9es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectantenatal screeninges_ES
dc.subjectbreastfeedinges_ES
dc.subjectHTLV-1es_ES
dc.titlePrevalence of HTLV-1/2 infection in pregnant women in Central and South America and the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107018es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Medicina Clínica


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 Prevalence of HTLV-1_2 infection in pregnant women in Central and South America and the Caribbean a systematic review and meta-analysis.pdf

1,38 MB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.