Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/39353
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Zaragoza, Tania-
dc.contributor.authorJover Diaz, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorPeris García, Juan Jorge-
dc.contributor.authorDelgado Sánchez, Elisabet-
dc.contributor.authorVerdú-Rico, José-
dc.contributor.authorLumbreras, Blanca-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Medicina Clínicaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-19T16:00:04Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-19T16:00:04Z-
dc.date.created2025-01-
dc.identifier.citationCureus . 2025 Jan 26;17(1):e77991es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2168-8184-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/39353-
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to evaluate the utility of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) test for various infectious indications, analyze its diagnostic value, and assess its correlation with suspected diagnoses. Additionally, secondary endpoints include evaluating the test's usefulness in clinical management and identifying predictors of PET/CT positivity. Methods: A retrospective descriptive observational study was conducted on in-hospital patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for suspected infections. Results: A total of 89 patients were reviewed. The predominant symptoms were fever (68.5%) and respiratory symptoms (38.2%). The most common prior complementary tests were microbiological (89.9%) and imaging (94.4%). Indications for PET/CT included fever of unknown origin (27%), focal infections (20.2%), bacteremia (34.8%), and immunocompromised patients (18%). Diagnostic confirmation was achieved in 60.7% of cases. The test's usefulness (confirmation and unexpected findings) was 76.4%. Only 9.5% of patients without an initial diagnosis after PET/CT received a confirmatory diagnosis later. The subgroup analysis revealed that fever of unknown origin was associated with a lower probability of confirmation and usefulness, whereas focal infection was linked to a higher likelihood of diagnostic confirmation. However, these associations did not persist in multivariate analysis due to the limited sample size. Conclusion: Our study aims to optimize the diagnostic profitability of the 18F-FDG PET/CT test for specific infectious disease indications by analyzing previous literature. In our experience, the PET/CT test demonstrated a high percentage of diagnostic confirmation for patients with focal infections. In contrast, its diagnostic yield was significantly lower for prolonged fever of unknown origin.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent9es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject18f-fdg pet/ctes_ES
dc.subjectbacteremiaes_ES
dc.subjectdiagnostic confirmationes_ES
dc.subjectfever of unknown origines_ES
dc.titleDiagnostic Utility of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Infectious Diseases: A Retrospective Studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion10.7759/cureus.77991es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Medicina Clínica


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 Diagnostic Utility of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomograph y Computed Tomography in Infectious Diseases A Retrospective Study.pdf

164,85 kB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.