Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/39227
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCastillo Ruiz, Francisco J.-
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Jiménez, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Roldán, Gregorio L.-
dc.contributor.authorSola Guirado, Rafael R.-
dc.contributor.authorAgüera Vega, Juan-
dc.contributor.authorCastro García, Sergio-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ingenieríaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-12T09:48:10Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-12T09:48:10Z-
dc.date.created2015-
dc.identifier.citationSpanish Journal of Agricultural Research13(2), e0209, 8 pages (2015)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2171-9292-
dc.identifier.issn1695-971X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/39227-
dc.description.abstractOlive fruit production and oil quality distribution with respect to canopy distribution are important criteria for selection and improvement of mechanical harvesting methods. Tests were performed in a high-density olive orchard (Olea europea L., cv. Arbequina) in southern Spain. Fruit distribution, fruit properties and oil parameters were measured by taken separate samples for each canopy location and tree. Results showed a high percentage of fruits and oil located in the middle-outer and upper canopy, representing more than 60% of total production. The position of these fruits along with their higher weight per fruit, maturity index and polyphenol content make them the target for all mechanical harvesting systems. The fruits from the lower canopy represented close to 30% of fruit and oil production, however, the mechanical harvesting of these fruits is inefficient for mechanical harvesting systems. Whether these fruits cannot be properly harvested, enhance tree training to raise their position is recommended. Fruits located inside the canopy are not a target location for mechanical harvesting systems as they were a small percentage of the total fruit (<10%). Significant differences were found for polyphenol content with respect to canopy height, although this was not the case with acidity. In addition, the ripening index did not influence polyphenol content and acidity values within the canopy. Fruit production, properties and oil quality varied depending on fruit canopy position. Thus harvesting systems may be targeted at maximize harvesting efficiency including an adequate tree training system adapted to the harvesting system.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent8es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicases_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectOlea europaea L.es_ES
dc.subjectcanopy shakeres_ES
dc.subjectstraddle harvesteres_ES
dc.subjecttrunk shakeres_ES
dc.subjecttree traininges_ES
dc.titleAnalysis of fruit and oil quantity and quality distribution in high-density olive trees in order to improve the mechanical harvesting processes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2015132-6513es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos - Ingeniería


thumbnail_pdf
View/Open:
 6513-Article Text-23607-1-10-20150529 (1).pdf

290,35 kB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???