Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/38520
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorOncina Canovas, Alejandro-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Palacios, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorNotario Barandiaran, Leyre-
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Collado, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorSignes-Pastor, Antonio Jose-
dc.contributor.authorde-Madaria, Enrique-
dc.contributor.authorSantibañez, Miguel-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia de la Hera, Manuela-
dc.contributor.authorVioque, Jesús-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Salud Pública, Historia de la Ciencia y Ginecologíaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-26T13:20:16Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-26T13:20:16Z-
dc.date.created2022-12-
dc.identifier.citationNutrients . 2022 Dec 12;14(24):5288es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2072-6643-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/38520-
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to evaluate the association between three previously defined pro-vegetarian (PVG) food patterns and the cancers of the oesophagus, stomach, and pancreas in a multi case-control study. We analyzed data from a multi-case hospital-based study carried out in two Mediterranean provinces in Spain. A total of 1233 participants were included in the analyses: 778 incident cancer cases, histologically confirmed (199 oesophagus, 414 stomach, and 165 pancreas) and 455 controls. A dietary assessment was performed using a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Three PVG food patterns (general, healthful, and unhealthful) were estimated using 12 food groups for the general PVG (gPVG), scoring positive plant-based foods and negative animal-based foods, and 18 food groups, for the healthful (hPVG) and unhealthful (uPVG) food patterns. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate relative risk ratios (RRR) and confidence intervals (95% CI) for quintiles of adherence to PVG patterns and as a continuous variable. The RRR (95% CI) for the highest vs. the lowest quintile of gPVG were, RRR = 0.37 (0.32, 0.42) for the oesophagus, RRR = 0.34 (0.27, 0.43) for the stomach, and RRR = 0.43 (0.35, 0.52) for pancreas cancer. For the hPVG, the RRR were RRR = 0.72 (0.58, 0.90) for the oesophagus, RRR = 0.42 (0.34, 0.52) for the stomach, and RRR = 0.74 (0.59, 0.92) for pancreas cancer. The uPVG was associated with a higher risk of stomach cancer RRR = 1.76 (1.42, 2.18). Higher adherence to gPVG and hPVG food patterns is associated with a lower risk of oesophageal, stomach, and pancreas cancers, while a higher adherence to a uPVG food pattern is associated with a higher risk of stomach cancer.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent12es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectcanceres_ES
dc.subjectfood qualityes_ES
dc.subjectoesophaguses_ES
dc.subjectpancreases_ES
dc.subjectpro-vegetarian food patternses_ES
dc.titleAdherence to Pro-Vegetarian Food Patterns and Risk of Oesophagus, Stomach, and Pancreas Cancers: A Multi Case-Control Study (The PANESOES Study)es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion10.3390/nu14245288es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Salud Pública, Historia de la Ciencia y Ginecología


thumbnail_pdf
Ver/Abrir:
 Adherence to Pro-Vegetarian Food Patterns and Risk of.pdf

295,5 kB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.