Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/35845
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorHURTADO-POMARES, MIRIAM-
dc.contributor.authorTerol Cantero, M Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Perez, Alicia-
dc.contributor.authorLeiva-Santana, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorPeral-Gómez, Paula-
dc.contributor.authorValera-Gran, Desirée-
dc.contributor.authorNavarrete-Muñoz, Eva María-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Patología y Cirugíaes_ES
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ciencias del Comportamiento y saludes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T09:03:27Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-07T09:03:27Z-
dc.date.created2018-11-19-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS One. 2018 Nov 19;13(11):e0207698es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/35845-
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Deficits in executive functions (EFs) are frequently detected in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) is a screening test for assessing EFs although it has not been so far adapted and validated in Spain. We evaluated the reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the FAB (FAB-E) in PD patients. Materials and methods Our study included 54 healthy subjects and 67 PD patients. Cognitive assessment of participants was conducted using the FAB-E, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trail Making Test (TMT), Revised-Barcelona Test (RBT) and Executive Interview (EXIT-25). Internal consistency, intra- and test-retest reliabilities, concurrent and discriminant validity of the FAB-E were examined. To evaluate the influence of cognitive dysfunction in PD on the performance of the FAB-E, we also classified the PD patients into groups according to their cognitive status as measured by the MMSE using published criteria to identify cognitive déficits in PD. Results The FAB-E showed good internal consistency (α = 0.751). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ranging from 0.559 to 0.891) and Spearman correlations (from 0.494 to 0.864) of the FAB-E subtests indicated a good-strong reliability. The total and subtest scores generally showed a good concurrent validity, except for the prehension behaviour item of the FAB-E and the Interference and Go/no-go tasks of the EXIT-25 that presented low estimates. Excluding the prehension behaviour subtest, the performance of the FAB-E was higher in the control group than in PD patients. Cognitive dysfunction in PD patients also indicated significant poorer FAB-E scores excepting the motor and prehension behaviour subtests. Discriminant analysis determined a cut-off of 14.5 was optimal to differentiate healthy subjects from PD patients. Moreover, a cut-off <12.5 allocated satisfactorily those PD patients with cognitive impairment (MMSE<26) and scores <11.5 classified suitably those PD patients with dementia (MMSE<24). Conclusion The FAB-E is an accurate tool for evaluating EFs in patients with PD and can provide useful information for distinguishing PD patients with and without cognitive dysfunction at a bedside assessment.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent16es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPublic Library of Sciencees_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleMeasuring executive dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB-E)es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207698es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Patología y Cirugía


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 Measuring Executive dysfunction in PD. Reliability and validity of FAB.pdf

1,34 MB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.