Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/35790
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Picazo, Alejandro-
dc.contributor.authorcolon useche, sarin-
dc.contributor.authorPérez Amorós, Blanca-
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-Alvarez, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorMolina Martínez, Irene-
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-Alvarez, Isabel-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Arieta, Alfredo-
dc.contributor.authorBermejo, Marival-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ingenieríaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-04T13:49:42Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-04T13:49:42Z-
dc.date.created2019-
dc.identifier.citationPharmaceuticses_ES
dc.identifier.issn1999-4923-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/35790-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this work is to explore the predictive ability of the biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS) biowaiver based on the dissolution methods for two pravastatin test products, where one of them showed bioequivalence (BE) while the other test failed (non-bioequivalence, or NBE), and to explore the reasons for the BE failure. Experimental solubility and permeability data confirmed that pravastatin is a BCS class III compound. The permeability experiments confirmed that the NBE formulation significantly increased pravastatin permeability, and could explain its higher absorption rate and higher Cmax. This finding highlights the relevance of requiring similar excipients for BCS class III drugs. The BCS-based biowaiver dissolution tests at pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8, with the paddle apparatus at 50 rpm in 900 mL media, were not able to detect differences in pravastatin products, although the NBE formulation exhibited a more rapid dissolution at earlier sampling times. Dissolution tests conducted in 500 mL did not achieve complete dissolution, and both formulations were dissimilar because the amount dissolved at 15 min was less than 85%. The difference was less than 10% at pH 1.2 and 4.5, while at pH 6.8 f2, results reflected the Cmax rank order.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent10es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries11es_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries12es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectBioequivalencees_ES
dc.subjectBiopharmaceutics Classification Systemes_ES
dc.subjectIn vitroes_ES
dc.subjectDissolution testes_ES
dc.subjectPravastatines_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::61 - Medicina::615 - Farmacología. Terapéutica. Toxicología. Radiologíaes_ES
dc.titleInvestigation to Explain Bioequivalence Failure in Pravastatin Immediate-Release Productses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11120663es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Ingeniería


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 Noviembre 2019_Investigation-to-explain-bioequival.pdf

2,03 MB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.