Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34959
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCarratalá-Munuera, Concepción-
dc.contributor.authorCortés Castell, Ernesto-
dc.contributor.authorMárquez-Contreras, Emilio-
dc.contributor.authorCastellano, José maria-
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Paramo, María-
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Pineda, Adriana-
dc.contributor.authorGil-Guillén, Vicente F-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Medicina Clínicaes_ES
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Farmacología, Pediatría y Química Orgánicaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-18T12:40:05Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-18T12:40:05Z-
dc.date.created2022-03-11-
dc.identifier.citationPatient Prefer Adherence . 2022 Mar 11:16:697-707es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1177-889X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/34959-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To identify the barriers affecting treatment adherence in patients with chronic disease and to determine solutions through the physician’s opinion of primary care and hospital settings. Methods: An observational study using the nominal group technique was performed to reach a consensus from experts. A structured face-to-face group discussion was carried out with physicians with more than 10 years of experience in the subject of treatment adherence/compliance in either the primary care setting or the hospital setting. The experts individually rated a list of questions using the Likert scale and prioritized the top 10 questions to identify barriers and seek solutions afterward. The top 10 questions that obtained the maximum score for both groups of experts were prioritized. During the final discussion group, participating experts analyzed the prioritized items and debated on each problem to reach consensual solutions for improvement. Results: A total of 17 professionals experts participated in the study, nine of them were from a primary care setting. In the expert group from the primary care setting, the proposed solution for the barrier identified as the highest priority was to simplify treatments, measure adherence and review medication. In the expert group from the hospital setting, the proposed solution for the barrier identified as the highest priority was training on motivational clinical interviews for healthcare workers undergraduate and postgraduate education. Finally, the expert participants proposed implementing an improvement plan with eight key ideas. Conclusion: A consensual improvement plan to facilitate the control of therapeutic adherence in patients with chronic disease was developed, taking into account expert physicians’ opinions from primary care and hospital settings about barriers and solutions to address therapeutic adherence in patients with chronic disease. Keywords: treatment adherence and compliance, chronic disease, general practitioners, family practice, hospital medicine, consensuses_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent11es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherDovepresses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjecttreatment adherence and compliancees_ES
dc.subjectchronic diseasees_ES
dc.subjectgeneral practitionerses_ES
dc.subjectfamily practicees_ES
dc.subjecthospital medicinees_ES
dc.subjectconsensuses_ES
dc.titleBarriers and Solutions to Improve Therapeutic Adherence from the Perspective of Primary Care and Hospital-Based Physicianses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion10.2147/PPA.S319084es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Medicina Clínica


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 Barriers and Solutions to Improve Therapeutic.pdf

885,28 kB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.