Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34565
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAgüero-Domenech, Núria-
dc.contributor.authorBernabeu, Eduardo-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Valentín, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorSarrión, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorJover, Silvia-
dc.contributor.authorBaranda, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorCORTÉS CASTELL, ERNESTO-
dc.contributor.authorGil-Guillén, Vicente F-
dc.contributor.authorMaría J., García-Teruel-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Salud Pública, Historia de la Ciencia y Ginecologíaes_ES
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Histología y Anatomíaes_ES
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Farmacología, Pediatría y Química Orgánicaes_ES
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Medicina Clínicaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T20:11:39Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-15T20:11:39Z-
dc.date.created2023-04-19-
dc.identifier.citationNutrients . 2023 Apr 19;15(8):1972es_ES
dc.identifier.isbn2072-6643-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/34565-
dc.description.abstractThe main source of vitamin D results from skin sunlight exposure. Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is linked to several adverse events during pregnancy. While performing a cross-sectional study with 886 pregnant women in Elda (Spain) from September 2019 to July 2020 to determine the association of VDD with gestational diabetes mellitus in relation to body mass index, a strict lockdown (SL) due to the COVID-19 pandemic was declared from 15 March 2020 to 15 May 2020. To determine if VDD prevalence in the local population of pregnant women was influenced by SL, a retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to estimate the prevalence odds ratio (POR) for the association of VDD and SL. A crude logistic regression model was calculated, and then further adjusted by the biweekly measured vitamin D-specific UVB dose in our geographical area. The POR during SL was 4.0 (95%CI = 2.7–5.7), with a VDD prevalence of 77.8% in the quarantine period. Our results revealed that VDD prevalence in pregnant women was influenced by SL. This valuable information could guide us in future if public officials order the population to stay indoors for any given reason.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent11es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectquarantinees_ES
dc.subject25(OH)D concentrationes_ES
dc.subjectvitamin D deficiencyes_ES
dc.subjectirradiationes_ES
dc.subjectpregnant womenes_ES
dc.titleInfluence of Strict Lockdown on Vitamin D Deficiency in Pregnant Women: A Word of Cautiones_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion10.3390/nu15081972.es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Medicina Clínica


Thumbnail

View/Open:
 Influence of Strict Lockdown on Vitamin D Deficiency in.pdf

1,11 MB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???