<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34245">
    <title>DSpace Colección :</title>
    <link>https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34245</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34246" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-10T10:46:21Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34246">
    <title>Comparison of Dimensionality Reduction Methods for Road Surface Identification System</title>
    <link>https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34246</link>
    <description>Título : Comparison of Dimensionality Reduction Methods for Road Surface Identification System
Autor : Safont, Gonzalo; Salazar, Addisson; Rodríguez, Alberto; Vergara, Luis
Resumen : Road surface identification is attracting more attention in recent years&#xD;
as part of the development of autonomous vehicle technologies. Most works consider&#xD;
multiple sensors and many features in order to produce a more reliable&#xD;
and robust result. However, on-board limitations and generalization concerns dictate&#xD;
the need for dimensionality reduction methods. This work considers four&#xD;
dimensionality reduction methods: principal component analysis, sequential feature&#xD;
selection, ReliefF, and a novel feature ranking method. These methods are&#xD;
used on data obtained from a modified passenger car with four types of sensors.&#xD;
Results were obtained using three classifiers (linear discriminant analysis, support&#xD;
vector machines, and random forests) and a late fusion method based on&#xD;
alpha integration, reaching up to 96.10% accuracy. The considered dimensionality&#xD;
reduction methods were able to reduce the number of features required for&#xD;
classification greatly and increased classification performance. Furthermore, the&#xD;
proposed method was faster than ReliefF and sequential feature selection and&#xD;
yielded similar improvements.</description>
    <dc:date>2025-01-09T13:37:46Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

