<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Colección :</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34245" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34245</id>
  <updated>2026-04-10T09:07:44Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-10T09:07:44Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Comparison of Dimensionality Reduction Methods for Road Surface Identification System</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34246" />
    <author>
      <name>Safont, Gonzalo</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Salazar, Addisson</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Rodríguez, Alberto</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Vergara, Luis</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://hdl.handle.net/11000/34246</id>
    <updated>2025-01-10T02:02:36Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-09T13:37:46Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título : Comparison of Dimensionality Reduction Methods for Road Surface Identification System
Autor : Safont, Gonzalo; Salazar, Addisson; Rodríguez, Alberto; Vergara, Luis
Resumen : Road surface identification is attracting more attention in recent years&#xD;
as part of the development of autonomous vehicle technologies. Most works consider&#xD;
multiple sensors and many features in order to produce a more reliable&#xD;
and robust result. However, on-board limitations and generalization concerns dictate&#xD;
the need for dimensionality reduction methods. This work considers four&#xD;
dimensionality reduction methods: principal component analysis, sequential feature&#xD;
selection, ReliefF, and a novel feature ranking method. These methods are&#xD;
used on data obtained from a modified passenger car with four types of sensors.&#xD;
Results were obtained using three classifiers (linear discriminant analysis, support&#xD;
vector machines, and random forests) and a late fusion method based on&#xD;
alpha integration, reaching up to 96.10% accuracy. The considered dimensionality&#xD;
reduction methods were able to reduce the number of features required for&#xD;
classification greatly and increased classification performance. Furthermore, the&#xD;
proposed method was faster than ReliefF and sequential feature selection and&#xD;
yielded similar improvements.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-09T13:37:46Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

