Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/31025
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLópez Plaza, Diego-
dc.contributor.authorJuan Recio, Casto-
dc.contributor.authorBarbado, David-
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Pérez, Iñaki-
dc.contributor.authorVera-Garcia, Francisco J-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ciencias del Deportees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T09:04:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T09:04:28Z-
dc.date.created2018-05-
dc.identifier.citationPM&R Volume 10, Issue 12, December 2018, Pages 1344-1352es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1934-1563-
dc.identifier.issn1934-1482-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/31025-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Although the Star Excursion Balance test (SEBT) has shown a good intrasession reliability, the intersession reliability of this test has not been deeply studied. Furthermore, there is an evident high influence of the lower limbs in the performance of the SEBT, so even if it has been used to measure core stability, it is possibly not the most suitable measurement. Objective: (1) To assess the absolute and relative between-session reliability of the SEBT and 2 novel variations of this test to assess trunk postural control while sitting, ie, the Star Excursion Sitting Test (SEST) and the Star Excursion Timing Test (SETT); and (2) to analyze the relationships between these 3 test scores. Design: Correlational and reliability testeretest study. Setting: Controlled laboratory environment. Participants: Twenty-seven physically active men (age: 24.54 3.05 years). Method: Relative and absolute reliability of the SEBT, SEST, and SETT were calculated through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM), respectively. A Pearson correlation analysis was carried out between the variables of the 3 tests. Main Outcome Measures: Maximum normalized reach distances were assessed for different SEBT and SEST directions. In addition, composite indexes were calculated for SEBT, SEST, and SETT. Results: The SEBT (dominant leg: ICC ¼ 0.87 [0.73-0.94], SEM ¼ 2.12 [1.66-2.93]; nondominant leg: ICC ¼ 0.74 [0.50-0.87], SEM ¼ 3.23 [2.54-4.45]), SEST (ICC ¼ 0.85 [0.68-0.92], SEM ¼ 1.27 [1.03-1.80]), and SETT (ICC ¼ 0.61 [0.30-0.80], SEM ¼ 2.31 [1.82-3.17]) composite indexes showed moderate-to-high 1-month reliability. A learning effect was detected for some SEBT and SEST directions and for SEST and SETT composite indexes. No significant correlations were found between SEBT and its 2 variations (r .366; P > .05). A significant correlation was found between the SEST and SETT composite indexes (r ¼ .520; P > .01). Conclusions: SEBT, SEST, and SETT are reliable field protocols to measure postural control. However, whereas the SEBT assesses postural control in single-leg stance, SEST and SETT provide trunk postural control measures with lower influence of the lowerlimbs.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent9es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWiley [es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectExcursion Balance test (SEBT)es_ES
dc.subjectlower limbses_ES
dc.subjectmeasure core stabilityes_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::7 - Deporteses_ES
dc.titleReliability of the Star Excursion Balance Test and Two New Similar Protocols to Measure Trunk Postural Controles_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.012es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Ciencias del Deporte


no-thumbnailView/Open:

 2018_PM&R_Reliability of the Star Excursion Balance Test and Two New Similar Protocols to Measure Trunk.pdf



1,18 MB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???