Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/31024
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJUAN-RECIO, CASTO-
dc.contributor.authorLópez Plaza, Diego-
dc.contributor.authorBarbado, David-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Vaquero, María Pilar-
dc.contributor.authorVera-García, Francisco J.-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ciencias del Deportees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T09:04:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T09:04:11Z-
dc.date.created2017-02-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Sports Sciences Volume 36, 2018 - Issue 4es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1466-447X-
dc.identifier.issn0264-0414-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/31024-
dc.description.abstractDifferent methods have been developed to quantify trunk muscle strength and endurance. However, some important protocol characteristics are still unclear, hindering the selection of the most suitable tests in each specific situation. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and the relationship between 3 representative tests of the most common type of protocols used to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance. Twenty-seven healthy men performed each test twice spaced 1 month apart. Trunk strength and endurance were evaluated with an isokinetic dynamometer and 2 field tests including Biering-Sørensen test and Flexion–rotation trunk test. All tests showed a good relative consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]> 0.75), except for the isokinetic endurance variables which had low–moderate reliability (0.37 < ICC > 0.65). Absolute reliability seemed slightly better in the isokinetic protocol than in the field tests, which showed about 12% of test–retest score increase. No significant correlations were found between test scores. After a familiarisation period for the field tests, the 3 protocols can be used to obtain reliable measures of trunk muscle strength and endurance. Based on the correlation analysis, these measures are not related, which highlights the importance of selecting the most suitable trunk test for each situation.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent9es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Groupes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectIsokinetic dynamometryes_ES
dc.subjectfield testses_ES
dc.subjectendurancees_ES
dc.subjectreliabilityes_ES
dc.subjectcore muscleses_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::7 -Deporteses_ES
dc.titleReliability assessment and correlation analysis of 3 protocols to measure trunk muscle strength and endurancees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1307439es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Ciencias del Deporte


no-thumbnailView/Open:

 2018_JSS_Reliability assessment and correlation analysis of 3protocols tomeasure trunk muscle strength and endurance.pdf



1,07 MB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???