Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/5640
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorPino Abad, Miguel-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ciencia Jurídicaes
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-22T13:57:49Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-22T13:57:49Z-
dc.date.created2019-
dc.date.issued2020-01-22-
dc.identifier.issn2695-5792-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11000/5640-
dc.description.abstractSince the 13th century, there has been a detailed regulation of witness evidence in the legal system. This most certainly arose because of the strong misgivings of the legislator of the time in the light of past experience, when prevailing circumstances forced council authorities to allow all subjective means of evidence to have a greater role. Among these forms of evidence are the testimonies of individuals unconnected to the procedural relationship. What this ultimately demonstrated on many occasions was that their falsehood, a product of a bribe, friendship, enmity, kinship or simple ineptitude, led judges to rule in favour of litigants when in fact they should not have done so.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent32es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.relation.ispartofseries1es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.subjectwitnesses
dc.subjectineligibilityes
dc.subject.otherCDU::3 - Ciencias sociales::Derecho: 34es
dc.titleIneligible witnesses according to castilian territorial legislationes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doi10.21134/sjls.v0i1.1708-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.21134/sjls.v0i1.1708-
Aparece en las colecciones:
Spanish Journal of Legislative Studies (SJLS) Núm. 1 (2019)


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 Pino Abad, Miguel.pdf
316,21 kB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.