Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/30679
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJavaloyes, Alejandro-
dc.contributor.authorSarabia Marín, José Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorLamberts, Robert Patrick-
dc.contributor.authorPlews, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorMOYA-RAMÓN, MANUEL-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ciencias del Deportees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-26T09:48:01Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-26T09:48:01Z-
dc.date.created2020-06-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research 34(6)/1511–1518es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1064-8011-
dc.identifier.issn1533-4287-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/30679-
dc.description.abstractPredefined training programs are common place when prescribing training. Within predefined training, block periodization (BP) has emerged as a popular methodology because of its benefits. Heart rate variability (HRV) has been proposed as an effective tool for prescribing training. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of HRV-guided training against BP in road cycling. Twenty well-trained cyclists participated in this study. After a preliminary baseline period to establish their resting HRV, cyclists were divided into 2 groups: an HRV-guided group and a BP group, and they completed 8 training weeks. Cyclists completed 3 evaluations weeks, before and after each period. During the evaluation weeks, cyclists performed: (a) a graded exercise test to assess V̇O2max, peak power output (PPO), and ventilatory thresholds with their corresponding power output (VT1, VT2, WVT1, and WVT2, respectively) and (b) a 40-minute simulated time-trial (40 TT). The HRV-guided group improved V̇O2max (p 5 0.03), PPO (p 5 0.01), WVT2 (p 5 0.02), WVT1 (p 5 0.01), and 40 TT (p 5 0.04). The BP group improved WVT2 (p 5 0.02). Between-group fitness and performance were similar after the study. The HRV-guided training could lead to a better timing in training prescription than BP in road cycling.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent8es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectcardiac autonomic regulationes_ES
dc.subjectcyclinges_ES
dc.subjectendurance traininges_ES
dc.subjectday-to-dayes_ES
dc.subjectaerobic performancees_ES
dc.subject.classificationEducación Física y Deportivaes_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::796 - Juegos.Deporteses_ES
dc.titleTraining Prescription Guided by Heart Rate Variability Vs. Block Periodization in Well-Trained Cyclistses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003337es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos Ciencias del Deporte


Thumbnail

View/Open:
 2020 Javaloyes - D2D vs block periodization in cycling.pdf

580,59 kB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???